Hmm, strange, where r them Xbox fan boys now, don't feel like throwing your thongs around in encouragement now do ya?

Foogin, a machine devised out of thievery. How bout that for rep...

A dance based strategy fighter....Heads up homos.

Ehm....I really get where this article tries to come from... But however, and especially when attempting to wrap up such an article with the notion that a rate of 5-6 in score DOESN'T mean it's not good....Well, that defeats the purpose of scoring in the first place...Doesn't it... Not to add, and in the other direction of what's claimed in the previous posts below, this is exactly the meaning of using the rating system altogether....Where 1 = poor, and 10 = Impeccable.... What's to be got at however, and which should've been posed in a more calculated form as well, is that there is the concept of "Fun" that should be considered, which isn't deterred at times by low scores... And therefore, I present a new category to Good / Bad or Pros / Cons approach in GS' as well as all reviews, the category of "Fun". Say for instance, Graphics: 5, Camera: 4...Overall and final Fun category: 7. I think that gets the core of this article's aim through, which I personally find highly unlikely, but possible to happen at times. More importantly though, just hope this article isn't just a reflection of Tom suffering from a guilty conscience :/

A creative partnership. Will give GS an edge over other gaming websites.