I dont know what kingbob said, but what does that have to do with my argument? Nothing
TheSterls
It has everything to do with your argument since you agree with him.
GOW3 is pushing far more on screen at a time , that is one area where GOW3 is more impressive and thats a fact. So once again I ask you , how does that picture have anything to do with a logical argument?
What does a fanmade picture have anything to do with what i said ? Crysis rarely has more then 6 enemies on screen at a time gow3 is pushing around 50 in some scenes and then you go post a image that some hermit made based off a 300 spoof .
TheSterls
I thought we only cared about graphics? kingbob always said scale didn't matter, so why would the number of enemies matter? Smells like double standards.
I dont know what kingbob said, but what does that have to do with my argument? Nothing
It has everything to do with your argument since you agree with him.
GOW3 is using CGI quality assets pretty much. You had all these people saying the trailer was pre-rendered now its been confirmed to be all real time and now you got people going ( o well it doesnt look that good). Give me a break when one compares Crysis to Gow3 Its a apples to oranges comparison but ther are things GOW3 does do beter on a technical levle. Hell its pushing up to 50 enemies on screen at a time compared to maybe the 6 you will see on Crysis and thats just one example.
TheSterls
Really?
Count how many enemies you can see here
What does a fanmade picture have anything to do with what i said ? Crysis rarely has more then 6 enemies on screen at a time gow3 is pushing around 50 in some scenes and then you go post a image that some hermit made based off a 300 spoof .
I thought we only cared about graphics? kingbob always said scale didn't matter, so why would the number of enemies matter? Smells like double standards.
Go here:http://www.gamespot.com/pages/forums/show_msgs.php?topic_id=27201148&tag=topics;title
Look at the posts written by the cows, and you'll have your example.
xOMGITSJASONx
I don't think anyone who honestly thinks God of war 3 looks as good as Crysis is a fanboy at all.Unless they bash Crysis.I played Crysis myself i think GOW 3 looks better but thats just me. Everyone has different opinions on what looks best to their eyes. Fanboys.. the real fanboys are garbage imo.
No, that wasn't my point. My point was that shoving your opinion down other people's throats en then crying about your opinion not being respected is being a fanboy. TC in that thread first says GOW3 has better art than Crysis, but calls any one who thinks Super Mario Galaxy looks better a lemming or a sheep. In the end, when he sees that nobody agrees with him anymore, he claims that the thread is about graphics, not art.
Its amazing how stuck on Crysis everyone is. I post proof that UC2 looks better, and the GTTV vid shows GOW3 looks better. I guess there's just no convincing people when they have their mind set:|
iKINGBOBi
You want to know why? Let me give you a hint: scientific facts make it impossible.
Yeah, the truth is Crysis has been dethroned a while back. 360 and Wii have nothing to compare against UC2 and GOW3, so Herms, Lems, and Sheep will downplay it and say you're crazy if you think anything looks better than Crysis when UC2 and GOW3 clearly does.
Bu-bu-bu-BULLLLLLLLLLL-shot!
But seriously, even those bullshots don't "destroy" Crysis, so you should stop trying. There's nothing better looking that bullshots, so it's already a lost case after that.
Log in to comment