Gamming

-support for 3D PS3 games

-PS2 forward compatibility

just like DVD up scaling most PS2 titles will play in 1080i

-motion controller intergration

- support for PSP Minis

PSP

- Downloaded PSP games will be able to be played on PS3

- ability to link PSP as a bluetooth controller

- ability to connect PS3 controller to PSP

Music

-added vissualizers

-custom soundtracks

with automated sound varrient (allows ps3 to control the volume based on the scene)

Home

- Home integration on the OS

- Make your home avatar your OS avatar

- Allows you to autostart to Home

- With a Free TV screen integration in home be able to see the cross media bar and control everything on your system

- allow friends into your home

- added voices (over 15 voice actors with combinable elements)

- added persona's

- more clothing options

-reworked controls- run/ jump

awsome

[QUOTE="gamecubepad"]

So, when Crysis 2 looks better than most/all PS3 exclusives, what will be the next excuse?

8Tango

When Gamespot and other websites post these Graphic comparisons, AKA: PS3 VS. 360 VS. PC It just doesn't show the true picture.

In their minds there keeping it fair by only comparing games that came out for all systems, sure some times there is an advantage in graphics to different consoles but the true picture is for the exclusives

If you look at Gta4 on both consoles of course they look a like Rockstar isn't going to make a totaly different game with the same title. But then when you compare exclusives, Killzone 2, Motorstorm, heck even Little Big planet has ten times more better graphic quality then the best game on 360.

So because game dev. have to limit down the scale of their games to work on the 360 as well it destroys the game for the ps3, I had a 360, and I left for the better graphics of the Ps3 and Im tired of looking at what I consider Last Gen games.

Inconclusion, i think that sony should try to get more exclusives, or game companies should make a game first for the Ps3 then make a port of the game for all the lower consoles, including 360

Sorry about the title It was just so 360 Fanboys would read

Dont even try to compare Thats just sad

When Gamespot and other websites post these Graphic comparisons, AKA: PS3 VS. 360 VS. PC It just doesn't show the true picture.

In their minds there keeping it fair by only comparing games that came out for all systems, sure some times there is an advantage in graphics to different consoles but the true picture is for the exclusives

If you look at Gta4 on both consoles of course they look a like Rockstar isn't going to make a totaly different game with the same title. But then when you compare exclusives, Killzone 2, Motorstorm, heck even Little Big planet has ten times more better graphic quality then the best game on 360.

So because game dev. have to limit down the scale of their games to work on the 360 as well it destroys the game for the ps3, I had a 360, and I left for the better graphics of the Ps3 and Im tired of looking at what I consider Last Gen games.

Inconclusion, i think that sony should try to get more exclusives, or game companies should make a game first for the Ps3 then make a port of the game for all the lower consoles, including 360

Sorry about the title It was just so 360 Fanboys would read

[QUOTE="Tjeremiah1988"][QUOTE="bphan"]

What the hell is with all these sony fanboys infesting my thread. If you don't like the deal. Move on. Destructoid was right. Sony fanboys are the worst.

bphan

Gamers who are looking for a good deal. Not stupid Sony fanboys.

cough

just keeping the thread alive

In the digitaly distributed generation renting downloadable games would be enevitable, i also believe gamesharing would soon be an option, also if game manufactures no longer have to worry about producing and burning a million DVD's or Bluray disk it would be much cheaper maybe 35 for new releases,

also an idea that i had may be the cure a new feature called download buffer, basically just like a video is a couple of kb's on your computer and the rest is streamed online, a buffer would cost about $10 less, you wont have to worry about updates cause it will be automatic, and a 10 gig game would only have a buffer size of 256Mb's saving a ton of space, allowing people to have their games at a lower price, and having an option to upgrade to the full version latter. only problem is if theirs a day you dont have internet is a day you dont have the games you have buffers for.

what do you think

i have too speak from an economical stand point honestly 200 gigs= 20 games *60$ each=$1200 of games is more than enough insentive to pay an extra 40 a year for a membership even because if you accidently earase your harddrive you wont need to redownload,i atleast give microsoft credit for trying after all they started this generation to early and they had no idea how fast users would be filling up their 20 gig hard drives, also i said the BIGGEST storage solution is 120 gigs, i did not say it was common, and get ready because the Next gen of gaming in 2011 will be mostly only digital, which means no thousands of disk need to be created which means, games will start going down in price, which is good for everyone, as for gamestores, if you sell your games back to them they rip you off so badly its just not worth it if you think your going to get sick of a game save your money and rent.

god this thread what was the point of that last post???