other than lair and haze both not first party dev's what other game failed that was not great. again these fanboys are so bad at damage control.

tell me what has micrsoft have brought to your 360 (first party) other than halo 3(which are not first party now), over rated fps(pdz), if those games are bad on the ps 3 so isn't rare intire line up because only AAA games are good now. so explain to me how every exclusives fail and crap on the ps 3 then.

GARRYTH

Do you speak english? Or are you from a non-english speaking country? I can never understand anything that you write. What do you do for your job?

So I guess you have stopped pretending to not be ban envading anymore huh TC? Truth-slayer

huh I never got banned stop being mean and stop the H8

[QUOTE="IDateWhiteChick"][QUOTE="Terami"][QUOTE="IDateWhiteChick"]

[QUOTE="mnvike"]Not if they wanted blu-ray to win the format war. HDDVD would have easily won if not for the PS3.Terami

Well, if they wanted to win the video game war (which they easily could have), they should have released the PS3 earlier and for cheaper. Nice to know that Sony has their priorities straight for us gamers.

do you deny that Sony prioritized blu-ray as far more important than games?

Changing discs is not a big deal at all. I do it all the time when I change out my AAA, mandatory-installation-free games on my XBOX 360.

And it has been proven time and time again that a bigger medium is not yet needed. How many AAA devs need to say this? But I agree that one day it will be needed, but when that day occurs the drive will need to be able to read the format fast enough to not need mandatory installs. So, not in this generation. And blu-ray will not have been replaced by the time the next generation rolls around.

That would have caused chaos for the games that would be on the PS3. Some are one DVD9s, others are on Blu-Ray...I can't tell how much of deficit that would cause.Verge_6

probably not much, being that 90+% of PS3 games could fit on a DVD9. Compression could do the rest. Also, it could read the disk faster on a DVD9 and prevent having to have mandatory installs.

[QUOTE="IDateWhiteChick"]

[QUOTE="mnvike"]Not if they wanted blu-ray to win the format war. HDDVD would have easily won if not for the PS3.Terami

Well, if they wanted to win the video game war (which they easily could have), they should have released the PS3 earlier and for cheaper. Nice to know that Sony has their priorities straight for us gamers.

do you deny that Sony prioritized blu-ray as far more important than games?

nowraigth

why

Celebrate away.

But beware...what goes around...comes around. (Too Human)

Bread_or_Decide

I know. If you recall system wars cows attitudes during the PS2 era, it is coming around for them now.

No, releasing 1 year earlier is a silly gimmick, it's the price point that screwed them. I think if they released at the same time as they did, skiped blu-ray, and launched for $300, it would have been another playstation generation.DaBrainz

**agrees with you**

A bluray-less PS3 launched a year earlier with a nice price tag, would have been a killer. yeah

Forensic-Klown

thank you for agreeing with me. We are most certainly right.