[QUOTE="I_Am_Sexy"][QUOTE="-Jiggles-"] Here is the first and second definition of Normal provided by http://www.dictionary.com/:
1.conforming to the standard or the common type; usual; not abnormal; regular; natural.
2.serving to establish a standard.
If you know anything about quantum mechanics, you would know that nothing about it is "conforming to the standard of the common type."
-Jiggles-
definitions can change over time
nothing is set in stone
like I said, open your mind
standards are felxible as well, in refernece to the second definition, it's all based upon what is accepted, as soon as less occuring things are accepted as being normal but just happening less often, they will also be accepted as normal, and will probably make their way into your precious little dictionary
So... you're denying a valid source of information because of your own personal opinion?
My definition is up-to-date and so is my arguement on quantum physics, so you're not getting anywhere with your arguement. Again I say, quantum mechanics do not conform to regular scientific standards, and telling me to "open my mind" will do nothing to disprove my arguement otherwise.
As for nothing being "set in stone", the same could be said for your own arguement about everything existing being normal. The evidence used to back up a certain claim is what differs between something being accepted and something being rejected, and, quite frankly, you haven't provided any evidence to prove that everything that exists is normal.
this post made me really LOL
you just don't get it
you act like your argument is better because it came from what you call a "valid source" which is something controlled by other people
the difference between you and me is that I decided for myself what to believe, you just accept what was already there prepared for you, you don't think for yourself
which means, my argument actually hold more value, because it's open to change, it's flexible. whereas your position will only change when "they" say it has changed LOL you're just putty in their hands, and think it makes you smart
real smart people think for themsleves and don't just look to a book to back them up, if all your ideas come from books and not your own studying, then what good are you? seriously, it's like you're just an extension of the book itself. in that case, I don't need you, and anytime I want a book definiton, I'll get it straight from the book and cut out the middle man (you)
Log in to comment