[QUOTE="IamHush"][QUOTE="elpooz"][QUOTE="IamHush"][QUOTE="Colt45fool"][QUOTE="gamr92"][QUOTE="-Halftime-"]That album has such a chilled, soulful vibe. And Blu is on point lyrically throughout the whole album.
Dunno how anyone can call it boring
elpooz
Apparently Colt can... and iRock too.
it's about the only logical thing irock has said in about a week :)Oh, and ITI thinks it's boring too.
Congrats on finding multiple people with wack opinions :P
Blu's album is piffness...pure piffness.
Another Jmn...
There is no such thing as a wack opinion. The sound of this album could very well be too chill and laid back for some listeners. It's completely understandable that someone would find this album to be boring.
And it's not his album... Lyrics are only 1 part of a drop homie.
Opinions can be wack. The ontic status of an opinion does not preclude it from quailty descriptions. An opinion that is well informed and logically coherent is better than an opinion that lacks those things. Wack (or bad) opinions can be described as opinions that lack such a structure. I was just making fun of the other dude, but in all seriousness, opinions can and do have differences in quality. Some are just better than others.Blu>>>>their momma's momma's momma
:lol:
Stop trying to sound smart. Subjectivity is subjectivity. An opinion cannot be good or bad. Yes, it can be poorly supported or heavily supported. But it can't be good or bad. A opinion just is. An opinon can be ill informed, or well informed. But not wack or good. An even calling an opinion ill informed doesn't mean much. A rap fan saying a rap album is boring does not have an ill informed opinion, as they are a fan of the genre the music is coming from. ITI, probably the biggest Music/Rap head here, for example, knows tons about the genre. But his opinion is bad because he thinks this album is boring :lol: ? Please. Stop trying to make sense. You fail horribly dude...
Opinions don't need structure or support, they just are. They exist and vary from person to person, and can be molded by several things. They can't be bad or good, wack or tight, whatever. You can say that some are better supported and structured, having more substance to them, but saying that they are either good or bad is just nonsense.
:lol: that is completely retarded. You do realize that people hold opinions about EVERYTHING and not just music and art right? The nature of opinion in reference to art is impacted by the subjective nature of art, it is difficult to say opinions about art is good or bad simply because it is difficult to say whether art is good or bad. However, opinions about art are not quality nutural. The important part of the quality nature of opinion is NOT what the opinion supports, but on how it is formed and the basis of support. ITI may be well-imformed on matters of music, therefore his opinion would be a good opinion. On the otherhand, Blu's album could've been the first album Colt ever listened to, then (at least hypothetically) his opinion would be bad or, at the very least, worse than ITI's. Stop trying to read inbetween lines and infer the meaning of my statement, I never said they had wack opinions because they thought the album was bad (at least not seriously, I said I was joking and just poking fun with that statement). But sense you decided to be a wise-ass and assert the "opinions are subjective" criteria all people with "bad taste" refer back to, I decided to seriously address the issue.
Now, an good or bad opinion relies on it's structure, not it's content. Opinions are nothing more than a series of syllogisms, therefore they can be good or bad.
Sit down peon
Log in to comment