8.5 is a bad score?DJ_Headshot

I see no problem in him reviewing JRPG's.SaltyMeatballs

It's exceedingly clear that he doesn't like the genre. He always seems to complain about not having many choices, etc.

So what gives, why is he reviewing these games? Because frankly, I could argue that all racing games should get docked down because they don't let you do anything outside of the racetrack. But no, these are different genres, made for different purposes.

Wouldn't it make sense for someone who doesn't dislike the genre as a whole to take on the games? Because frankly I hate racing games. I'm not someone you'd want to review Forza 3 for example (i'd give it a 8.0 probably)

TC your a troll, Halo Reach looks like a contendor for graphics king.

Megaman5364

Halo Reach looks just like Halo 3. Halo 3 looks just like Halo 2. Therefore, Halo: Reach looks like Halo 2.

Halo Reach

Looks like Halo 2

Like seriously most multiplatform games look more different than these games do despite the generational leap.

To be frank, Halo: Reach is a downgrade. Halo 3, looked better than Halo: Reach

I again, don't understand. People are saying the graphics difference between Halo Reach and 3 is minimal, where as they say Halo 3 looks minimally different to Halo 2. So Reach looks like Halo 2? >.< I don't get it. Reach looks really good graphically, easily one of the best. Why are people so.....jees.