InEMplease's forum posts

Avatar image for InEMplease
InEMplease

7461

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

9

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 InEMplease
Member since 2009 • 7461 Posts

@silentchief said:
@Maroxad said:
@zaryia said:
@InEMplease said:

@zaryia: They're never going to take this seriously Save yourself the headache.

Yeah I'm not going to bother anymore. After he just spammed ad-hominems for two pages straight on my peer reviewed studies without even countering one with citatoin, I tried another tactic and gave him multiple court rulings literally stating my position as a legal fact. Racial Gerrymandering being objectively real. Still nothing.

There is no point, this is like "debating" a Flat Earther.

Its actually kinda funny how pretty much everyone on this board seem to be agreeing that SilentChief is not worth "debating" with. As well as how manyu people have been comparing them to a flat earther.

Whether it is the denial of transgender validity, or systemic racism. I have noticed this has been the go-to logical fallacy, to try to dismiss the studies that contradict their delusions.

Everyone on this board as the same 5 far left posters? 🤣🤣

Remember you think a man who dresses up as a women is a women and you're saying I'm delusional?

Its impossible to take you seriously so here's a puppy in a teacup.

Avatar image for InEMplease
InEMplease

7461

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

9

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 InEMplease
Member since 2009 • 7461 Posts

@sancho_panzer: WTF I bet you're a virgin.

Avatar image for InEMplease
InEMplease

7461

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

9

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 InEMplease
Member since 2009 • 7461 Posts

@sancho_panzer said:

@InEMplease: :((

Butt :)))

Avatar image for InEMplease
InEMplease

7461

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

9

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 InEMplease
Member since 2009 • 7461 Posts

@sancho_panzer said:

@InEMplease: I'm sorry, you've lost me.

I'm sorry too.

Avatar image for InEMplease
InEMplease

7461

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

9

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 InEMplease
Member since 2009 • 7461 Posts

@sancho_panzer said:

@InEMplease: "Acceptance, but only if you accept what we allow"

I mean, you're not wrong, but doesn't that describe literally every moral and legal code on earth?

Yeah, until some dweeb starts trying to tell everyone how to live their lives.

Avatar image for InEMplease
InEMplease

7461

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

9

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 InEMplease
Member since 2009 • 7461 Posts

@Maroxad said:
@sargentd said:

There is nothing that sticks out to me in the 10 commandments that is inherently bad. Sure you can not like them as much as something else written but what does that matter?

They are moral guidelines.

Most of your complaints are "this would be a horrible law to enforce".

No one's saying that, I thought this thread was about the 10 commandments being shown in a public school??

Read the bible, they are clearly intended as laws. Which is why a guy literally got the death penalty for working on the Sabbath.

But beyond being terrible laws: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 10 are also bad moral guidelines. Period.

They have no place in modern society. And the fact that some Republicans seem so obsessed with putting them all over the place is deeply disturbing. The American Century is over, and the Chinese century has begun. One reason for this is that, a good chunk the US is stuck clinging to the past, while China is embracing the future.

These Republicans, trying to shove them everywhere. are dragging america into the mud. And they should not be shown in public places, period. They belong in the church, nowhere else.

Acceptance, but only if you accept what we allow.

Avatar image for InEMplease
InEMplease

7461

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

9

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 InEMplease
Member since 2009 • 7461 Posts

@sargentd said:

@InEMplease: voter ID is necessary, so that's a win. Democrats are full of shit. Requiring ID to vote is not racist.

The constitution would disagree.

Avatar image for InEMplease
InEMplease

7461

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

9

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 InEMplease
Member since 2009 • 7461 Posts

@zaryia: They're never going to take this seriously Save yourself the headache.

Avatar image for InEMplease
InEMplease

7461

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

9

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 InEMplease
Member since 2009 • 7461 Posts

@tjandmia said:

@InEMplease: I fires we can understand the need for acceptance and they’re surely free to pretend they’re women all they want, but I, for one, will not be playing that game with them. I suspect chief is not either.

They're not pretending. Are you pretending to be yourself right now?

Avatar image for InEMplease
InEMplease

7461

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

9

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 InEMplease
Member since 2009 • 7461 Posts

@silentchief said:
@InEMplease said:
@silentchief said:
@InEMplease said:
@silentchief said:

Max claims a " trans women " is a women. That they are completely valid and says we have medical journals in neurology to back this up.

I say that is absolutely nonsense and any professional that comes up with that conclusion should be black balled from that field of study.

And you're wrong.. Boo hoo. Get over it.

If you think the previous picture I posted is a women than no I'm not wrong.

She could up her makeup game for sure. Why attack people that aren't hurting you?

It's a man bro. I'm not attacking them im just not pandering to the delusion.

It's not delusional. I live with delusional. They're people and they just want acceptance. I think it costs you more energy to hate them than to understand them.