@drunk_pi: What does anything you said have to do with news quality? No offensive, but you just wasted your time typing all that out. We get it, you think you are cool for hating President Trump.
Got anything to say that is on topic?
CNN:
Admitted to photoshopping George Zimmerman to make him look more white (why, other than to frame whites)?
Posts fake "Pol" news as fact.
Leaks debate questions to Shillary Clinton (Someone at CNN got fired over this so don't pretend like it didn't happen).
Uses video-game screenshots for news photos.
Do I have to keep going or do you get it now?
No I'm being totally serious. Trump's professionalism goes beyond what is shown at the Washington establishment. Unlike Obama who mocked a disabled reporter and encouraged violence at his rallies, Trump took a calm approach. He politely disagreed with the same reporter and even allowed the protesters to protest at his rally while encouraging his supporters to relax.
And you're absolutely right about CNN. Yeah, those controversies are sure enough to convince me never to watch CNN. Instead, I'll watch Russian Today, endorsed by our great leader Donald Trump. Also, Breitbert and Infowars are highly reliable sources of news.
You constantly dodge and weave all points anyone makes on this thread.
You keep doing this weird thing were you describe a situation were Trump would act the opposite of how you think he would act. An example of what you will say next might be something along the lines of "Trump is super calm and also very critical of Russia." What does any of this have to do with the topic?
I don't understand your point regarding watching Russian news. You are so extreme. I didn't say that your alternative to CNN had to be any of those extreme websites you mentioned (That I do not visit).
Log in to comment