oh gawd, it's so pretty that i wet myself. :oops:

it looks absolutely fantastic. it's like coh ubercharged. i love it.

Nevermind. Anyway, I'm starting to feel bad now. I got my comp with an 8800GT last November, and already only 1 year later, it's the recommended gfx card. :(Forerunner-117

what's the problem here? it's recommended by fallout 3! nothing can go wrong there. :P

[QUOTE="blackdreamhunk"]

[QUOTE="JnWycliffe"]i don't think pc games are even close to being photo-realistic.DanielDust

http://technology.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/tech_and_web/article4557935.ece

Crysis is FAR from photo-realistic. I'd be surprised if the most powerful desktop in the world and cryengine 2 would be able to render only one photo-realistic leaf in real time and that video doesn't prove nothing, only that technology advances. Something like that isn't possible in real time on a desktop PC and in real time.

Read that article again, even they say that the photo-realistic animations and graphics will be possible no sooner than 2020 or even longer, but that doesn't mean pc games/desktop PC's/standard graphic cards used for games, will be able to accomplish something like this in real time, that which we are interested in.

I could care less if CGI would become photo-realistic, all I care is that games look as good as they can in real time.

i agree with this 100%.

i'm getting far cry 2 and fallout 3, but i'm not expecting much from either. i might get dead space and red alert 3 as well, depending on how severe the drm issues are. all in all, a decent month.

but the best game of them all might be world of goo.