Or you could always play Dopesmoker, the hour-long song by Sleep that could blast your sub-woofer speakers apart. And then there's High on Fire...

If nothing happens, we should email all these people the YouTube video of the Keyboard Cat.

Depends on what your religion/beliefs are. I say we'll still be alive and thriving. Others may think we'll die in 2012. Or Jesus may come back to judge right and wrong....

I have no clue. Guess we'll have to wait.

Play the Foo Fighters at a louder volume and start a music fight.

[QUOTE="srdjan311"]

Yes, because here at Gamespot, we're super series.

Legendaryscmt

i think it it is opion for me

odst better campain

halo 3 better multyplayer

spetnaz14

Since Halo 3 came out with the multiplayer first, you could assume it's Halo 3's multiplayer. So really, ODST is campaign, firefight, and three new maps, but Halo 3's multiplayer packed with it.

And I agree with PimpiinPolak, a 1600 MS Points DLC would be much better in my point of view than a $60 CD game. When Halo 3 first came out, it was $60, and with ODST, you're paying for the Halo 3 multiplayer again (if you had already bought Halo 3).

I'm left-handed and I usually don't care much about which side, but when I have the option to I usually switch to the left side.

Orange Box. Half-Life 2 and Episodes 1 & 2= epic win. Team Fortress 2 = Lots of fun. Portal = best strategy ever.

I think the Orange Box beats Halo at the "more-bang-for-your-buck" idea, but Halo lasts longer and you can play it 2 years from now, and it'll still be fun.

Keep the thread alive! I'm laughing my head off!

On the PC, Raven Squad certainly comes to mind. (We just posted our review:http://www.gamespot.com/pc/action/ravensquadhiddendagger/review.html)

However, Stalin Vs. Martians is about as bad as games get--and Stormrise gives it a run for the money.

Kevin-V

Hahaha I just watched a gameplay video on that game and the voice acting is so horribly hilarious!