[QUOTE="Mad_Rhetoric"]the ps3can't have anywhere near the number of zombies on screen as the 360, ps3's RAM is split, unlike the 360sSiiSsy

But Gears has like 4 enemies at a time?

This whole ram thing irks the **** outta me...

Did resistance look anything like gears? Nope.

The example you just used is just sad. You're definitely not helping out your cause kid.

If you don't understand to concept of RAM...hahahaha that was fun to say...then don't bring up arguements that have to do with RAM or the lack of.

I just think game creators are making stupid sacrafices when they should cut 360 off sometimes.

GTA IV was delayed for 360 problems....everyone knows it....but nobody says anything...

MS said no game would be on multiple discs....Blue Dragon on 3...Rage on 2...maybe 3....

Seriously.....

I have a lot of faith in a sequel to Dead Rising being an absolute monster on consoles....but if the Xbox is the console its built around...well...then we can expect dead rising one with slightly better graphics....

SiiSsy

link? no? failed? I think so. Give it up.

I think Dead Rising2should be built for PS3 exclusively!

I am starting to believe that Xbox is just too old skool for these more ambitious games now days.

Rage and Blue Dragon being on 2 discs as proof.

If we want a BBBBBIIIIIIGGGGGG zombie filled GTA IV sized city with missions and holdouts we are gonna need a system capable of such ambition....PS3. It has everything you could need in the form of HDD downloads and Blu-ray space!

(plz dont bring up ram because Bioshock requires 2 GB of ram on PC and PS3 has 512 megs of RAM split in half so dont get all techy about that cuz it usually ends the same way...Crysis is amazing)

SiiSsy

lol at blue dragon.....its a cheap rpg copy of dragon ball z

lol at the 360 the most faulty system this gen

oscarVD

and the ps3 is still behind the 360 and the wii.

you don't really have any room to talk, no one does.

[QUOTE="Kekira"][QUOTE="cheezisgoooood"][QUOTE="Kekira"]

[QUOTE="cheezisgoooood"]Why is Bioshock not in there? Look, we know that it's not exclusive to the 360, but it is exclusive to Microsoft, and this is, after all, Microsoft's representative, not the 360's. Put Bioshock up there, now.cheezisgoooood

No it's not. MS does not own the PC market.

But they do own Games for Windows which Bioshock just so happens to be releasing under.

Make no mistake. Bioshock is Microsoft exclusive, they may not own the PC market but they do own the Games for Windows label, Bioshock is releasing for 360 and Games for Windows, nothing else, it is Microsoft exclusive.

Why so much bolding? And what you have been saying contradicts. You just said it's MS exclusive then you say it's not and then you say it's only releasing under Games for Windows and nothing else. Which is it? Either way, it's still multiplat, it's not ONLY on the 360, it's on the PC too.

Microsoft owns Windows. Bioshock is released under the label Games for Windows, I said Bioshock is releasing under the 360 and Games for Windows labels, and nothing else, I didn't say it was only releasing for Games for Windows. It is a microsoft exclusive and therefore either it should be included in this list, OR the title must be changed to 360 representative, and a separate topic must be made saying PC representative. Get the picture?

The reason I bolded so much is the same reason I just had to bold the word and in my quote. Reading comprehension.

hey, listen to me. A moderator has stated that there is NO SUCH THING as a MS exclusive here on GS.

Yeah, it makes sense and it is obvious only MS will be dealing with Bioshock. But here on Gamespot there is no such thing as microsoft exclusive.

and that's it.

Where did that Halo 3 screen come from? I've never seen it before..._KenKittyragi_

i was thinking the same thing.

[QUOTE="KAS3Y_JAM3Z"][QUOTE="ball_of_air"]

[QUOTE="Vandalvideo"][QUOTE="musicalmac"][QUOTE="myke2010"]Silent Hill 5 was already a confirmed multiplat for PS3 and 360.Zero_Fate_

Don't forget The Darkness too.

that's NO WHERE near survival horror.

The game isn't even a horror game, it's an fps...

I love the Darkness (Hence my icon) but it has the more superhero/anti hero vibe to it.

I had a GREAT time playing the darkness, I loved it.

Im just saying it is no where near a surival horror game, or a horror game.

[QUOTE="TheDarkDisciple"]whaaat? did your account get hijacked or something??xjet039

no my 360 just broke for the freaking 5th time and im done with xbox until the console gets its act together.

Im sure... :roll:

[QUOTE="Vandalvideo"][QUOTE="musicalmac"][QUOTE="myke2010"]Silent Hill 5 was already a confirmed multiplat for PS3 and 360.ball_of_air

Don't forget The Darkness too.

that's NO WHERE near survival horror.

The game isn't even a horror game, it's an fps...

It's their own fault for going down under. They seem to be bashing every game and the PS 3 as well. Game Informer is a much better magazine. I don't know what the hell happend to EGM. But that's not the EGM of old. Everything that has a beginning had an end. -The Oracle.Unstoppable_1

it's their own fault they are going bankrupt because they disliked some games? :roll: yeah, that makes sense.