KAS3Y_JAM3Z's forum posts

Avatar image for KAS3Y_JAM3Z
KAS3Y_JAM3Z

1699

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

7

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 KAS3Y_JAM3Z
Member since 2006 • 1699 Posts
[QUOTE="KAS3Y_JAM3Z"][QUOTE="Zenkuso"][QUOTE="pundog"][QUOTE="-Renegade"][QUOTE="UpSwing"]

I don't see why I should expect an Amazing game from such an untalented developer.

Even IF they manage to get some good graphics going, I STILL have no faith the actual game will be any good.

In the ULTRA competitive FPS genre there are some Truly talented Devs out there.... Guerilla is NOT one of them.

Zenkuso

how about they have increased their force by over 100 developers and the project is now funded by sony which has spent millions of dollars on production?

Gears of War was done by a small team(I can't remember the number but I remember hearing well under 100)and only cost $10-15 million to make. It did pretty well last timeI checked.Bigger isn't always better.

Look at lost planet cost 25million to make, 25million to market and it still didn't do as well as expected, budget means nothing unless you have a good team and more devs doesn't make a game better, its just makes it faster to build. Why?

Because you can only have some many leads and then everyone else gets the slave jobs to actually build the game, more devs means they can split the work load, it doesn't mean it makes the game better just makes the workloads on each leads team so much less.

In some rare cases, some devs have a huge team with a lot of talent.

name 3.

let me go get my list...wtf?

Dude, I was agreeing with you...

Avatar image for KAS3Y_JAM3Z
KAS3Y_JAM3Z

1699

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

7

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 KAS3Y_JAM3Z
Member since 2006 • 1699 Posts
[QUOTE="pundog"][QUOTE="-Renegade"][QUOTE="UpSwing"]

I don't see why I should expect an Amazing game from such an untalented developer.

Even IF they manage to get some good graphics going, I STILL have no faith the actual game will be any good.

In the ULTRA competitive FPS genre there are some Truly talented Devs out there.... Guerilla is NOT one of them.

-Renegade

how about they have increased their force by over 100 developers and the project is now funded by sony which has spent millions of dollars on production?

Gears of War was done by a small team(I can't remember the number but I remember hearing well under 100)and only cost $10-15 million to make. It did pretty well last timeI checked.Bigger isn't always better.

geow of war lacked in single player and wasnt that impressive to me at all. its just another overhyped game by the lemmings once again.

I guess you're right and hundreds of respected pulications are wrong I guess, right? :roll:

Last time I checked GEOW had a single player...yep, I was right it totally has one.

Avatar image for KAS3Y_JAM3Z
KAS3Y_JAM3Z

1699

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

7

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 KAS3Y_JAM3Z
Member since 2006 • 1699 Posts
[QUOTE="pundog"][QUOTE="-Renegade"][QUOTE="UpSwing"]

I don't see why I should expect an Amazing game from such an untalented developer.

Even IF they manage to get some good graphics going, I STILL have no faith the actual game will be any good.

In the ULTRA competitive FPS genre there are some Truly talented Devs out there.... Guerilla is NOT one of them.

Zenkuso

how about they have increased their force by over 100 developers and the project is now funded by sony which has spent millions of dollars on production?

Gears of War was done by a small team(I can't remember the number but I remember hearing well under 100)and only cost $10-15 million to make. It did pretty well last timeI checked.Bigger isn't always better.

Look at lost planet cost 25million to make, 25million to market and it still didn't do as well as expected, budget means nothing unless you have a good team and more devs doesn't make a game better, its just makes it faster to build. Why?

Because you can only have some many leads and then everyone else gets the slave jobs to actually build the game, more devs means they can split the work load, it doesn't mean it makes the game better just makes the workloads on each leads team so much less.

In some rare cases, some devs have a huge team with a lot of talent.

Avatar image for KAS3Y_JAM3Z
KAS3Y_JAM3Z

1699

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

7

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 KAS3Y_JAM3Z
Member since 2006 • 1699 Posts
[QUOTE="KAS3Y_JAM3Z"][QUOTE="-Renegade"][QUOTE="UpSwing"]

I don't see why I should expect an Amazing game from such an untalented developer.

Even IF they manage to get some good graphics going, I STILL have no faith the actual game will be any good.

In the ULTRA competitive FPS genre there are some Truly talented Devs out there.... Guerilla is NOT one of them.

Blanco98

how about they have increased their force by over 100 developers and the project is now funded by sony which has spent millions of dollars on production?

Since when does money mean it's going to be a good game?

Errr since always more money means better Devs means better team, Gears costed the or near as Mcuh and the game was awsome wasent it?? They contract the best of the best teams and make games which are unbelievable

no, actually. The team was fairly small. A lot of devs actually have talent, unlike Gurellia.

P.S. I'm pretty sure Halo 3 has a massive team with a massive budget, so in your logic, halo 3 will be the best game ever made.

Avatar image for KAS3Y_JAM3Z
KAS3Y_JAM3Z

1699

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

7

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 KAS3Y_JAM3Z
Member since 2006 • 1699 Posts
[QUOTE="UpSwing"]

I don't see why I should expect an Amazing game from such an untalented developer.

Even IF they manage to get some good graphics going, I STILL have no faith the actual game will be any good.

In the ULTRA competitive FPS genre there are some Truly talented Devs out there.... Guerilla is NOT one of them.

-Renegade

how about they have increased their force by over 100 developers and the project is now funded by sony which has spent millions of dollars on production?

Since when does money mean it's going to be a good game?

Avatar image for KAS3Y_JAM3Z
KAS3Y_JAM3Z

1699

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

7

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 KAS3Y_JAM3Z
Member since 2006 • 1699 Posts
[QUOTE="6matt6"]

master chief or link.

so i can understand a bit more about them XD

TEH_rankie


Link maybe, but as ultimately cool as he is, Master Cheif would scare the pants off of me.

whats scary about a 7 foot tall cyborg super human death machine?

Avatar image for KAS3Y_JAM3Z
KAS3Y_JAM3Z

1699

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

7

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 KAS3Y_JAM3Z
Member since 2006 • 1699 Posts

I call a fake. No way the PS3 could pull that off.Eltroz

killzone wishes.

Avatar image for KAS3Y_JAM3Z
KAS3Y_JAM3Z

1699

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

7

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 KAS3Y_JAM3Z
Member since 2006 • 1699 Posts

Mass Erect.

jessesalinas
Hahahahahah someone PLEASE put this in their sig
Avatar image for KAS3Y_JAM3Z
KAS3Y_JAM3Z

1699

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

7

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 KAS3Y_JAM3Z
Member since 2006 • 1699 Posts

Don't know if you guys have read the one entitled 360 running out of boxes. Makes you wonder if 360 did install Folding.peenatrick

 

There is already a few threads about this. 

Avatar image for KAS3Y_JAM3Z
KAS3Y_JAM3Z

1699

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

7

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 KAS3Y_JAM3Z
Member since 2006 • 1699 Posts

[QUOTE="Prid3r"]Shadowrun was WAYYY more hated then hyped ( Because they transformed the PnP game into a FPS MP ) . I love shadowrun by the way , can't believe it only got a 6.9 ( a 8.0 in my book ( at least ) . Rhys555

Opinions change, but three reviews, all 6...ouch....

 

 

who cares...you're just trolling now. This game wasn't hyped to such a high degree and you're trying to claim ownage on something that no one really cared THAT much about in the first place.