Why is there always a thread on this subject every couple of months?
RTS, FPS,MMO (some RPG) = Kb/m
Platformer, Sports,Fighting = Controller
I forgot some genres but those were the obvious ones, I could think over of
Why is there always a thread on this subject every couple of months?
RTS, FPS,MMO (some RPG) = Kb/m
Platformer, Sports,Fighting = Controller
I forgot some genres but those were the obvious ones, I could think over of
[QUOTE="anthonydwyer"][QUOTE="PBSnipes"][QUOTE="anthonydwyer"]But they're not the same systems. Not only do they not grade on the same scale (since IGN uses decimal points), but they have different standards. Generally speaking Eurogamer is considered a tougher reviewer than IGN, so a 9 at Eurogamer does not equal a 9 at IGN.they both review games out of 10, you can expect this coming from the same reviewer, if one used a A,B,C system or a 5/5 you would be right, but their systems are nearly the same.
JLF1
you are giving the reveiwer to much credit if what you are saying is true whay did EG and IGN both give GTA 10/10, even with the decimal and using you logic GTA should never of got a 10 on EG if their standards are higher then IGNs
Ic where your coming from and I agree about the different standart but euragamer and edge are a bit weird and sum is up...If we go by your logic a 8 is technically a AAA since geow and mgs4 got an 8 from those sites but got ratings of 9-10 everywhere else. This all seems ok right but grid got a 9 recently, by that logic grid should be getting a 10 or very high 9s which I doubt it will get...Something is wrong with the standart of that side and it just dosent add up with the other reviewers.
[QUOTE="anthonydwyer"][QUOTE="PBSnipes"][QUOTE="anthonydwyer"]But they're not the same systems. Not only do they not grade on the same scale (since IGN uses decimal points), but they have different standards. Generally speaking Eurogamer is considered a tougher reviewer than IGN, so a 9 at Eurogamer does not equal a 9 at IGN.they both review games out of 10, you can expect this coming from the same reviewer, if one used a A,B,C system or a 5/5 you would be right, but their systems are nearly the same.
JLF1
you are giving the reveiwer to much credit if what you are saying is true whay did EG and IGN both give GTA 10/10, even with the decimal and using you logic GTA should never of got a 10 on EG if their standards are higher then IGNs
Ic where your coming from and I agree about the different standart but euragamer and edge are a bit weird and sum is up...If we go by your logic a 8 is technically a AAA since geow and mgs4 got an 8 from those sites but got ratings of 9-10 everywhere else. This all seems ok right but grid got a 9 recently, by that logic grid should be getting a 10 or very high 9s which I doubt it will get...Something is wrong with the standart of that side and it just dosent add up with the other reviewers.
Can that guy str1ka get banned or something...Hes spreading BS around. Since when has online been a standard this generation? Its not a standard for every genre but a standard for Shooters, Sports, Racing, Fighting( if you will) and a maybe something that I forgot. And even some of those genres work well without online. Online is NOT a standard for RPG, action or adventure and other genres.
I dont like to post much in these forums but I had to because you kept replying that bs many times...
So I bough my ps3 2 days ago and im loving everything about it expect for one thing. Why do I have to install everytime I put in a new game or want to access online for a new game?!?! At first it was ok but its getting pretty annoying. Is sony
[QUOTE="Mad_Rhetoric"]rockstar paid off every site for a perfect scorelawlessx
they put the 50 million microsoft gave them to good use :lol:
LOL that might be so. Honestly it wouldnt be stupid on their part, free money given away to every site to get the only modern game in a decade a perfect score!!
Log in to comment