numba1234 is a diehard spyro fan so w-e we say wont change his mind. However the fact is BK was the best platformer of its time...you say SM64 was the best, which it technically is since it started the 3d platforming( its tied with BK and DK64 for me) but BK improved on what SM64 was and is some what similar to it. So I dont understand how u can love SM64 but not BK. IMO DK64 BK SM64 Rayman 2 were all better platformers then Spyro.

PS: How the **** does Kazooie have a bad lvl design? Its one of the best, I agree tooie wasnt as nice but your argument falls flat in its face when you say Kazooie has a bad lvl design.

[QUOTE="numba1234"]The game won't even break a million. THe first 2 games in this seires, had sales comparable to the R&C series. Why would a 10 year old game, that wasn't even that popular to begin with be on the sales of a Mario game, or halo game. The first 2 weren't even amazing games to begin with. Overrated 'graphic' wonders would be compliment to those games. Spyro series, Rayman 2, and Super mario 64 completely destoryed those games.sexy_chimp

Uhh...I know Banjo Kazooie sold over 4 million so I don't know what your talking about.

And Banjo Kazooie is by far the best platforming series out there, next to MAYBE Mario.

LMAOOO this guy lost all his credibility...Spyro better then BK? I don't care if its your opinion or not, you have bad taste.

Edit : gram

[QUOTE="Gunraidan"][QUOTE="blitzkid1"]

is this why lost odyssey story and characters are better than rogue galaxys.

blitzkid1

Yeah I play video games to play them.

i guess you agreed with me on the repatative dungeons.

Funny you bring up Rogue Galaxy...what about the DARK CLOUD series? No comparison there. I havent played Lost odyssey but rogue galaxy was an amazing game and is prob better from the reviews. I wouldnt take your word anyways since your a diehard lost odyssey fan...

[QUOTE="Benevolentbob"][QUOTE="mjarantilla"][QUOTE="JLF1"]

[QUOTE="Benevolentbob"]I don't like what square has become. I know there are plenty who won't agree with me that this was the right choice, but I have switched over to Mistwalker when it comes to JRPGS. mjarantilla

Mistwalker? WTF? They've released two RPGs, one of them mediocre and the other one only a bit above average, and suddenly they're the new kings? Now, I was as excited as anyone for Lost Odyssey, but come on.

That's your own opinion. In my opinon Blue Dragon was about a 7 and Lost Odyssey is looking to be in the 9s. It was rated lower here because of technical issues, and many of those have been fixed, although I didn't really care about technica issues in the first place. The other reason it was rated lower is because it uses turn based combat. First of all Final Fantasy did nothing but turn based for years on end and it was never rated lower, and second of all, I sort of like turn based combat.

LIES! Lost odyssey isnt shapping up to be in the 9s? It has a avg of 78. I havent played the game so I cant comment if its a good game or not but if your gonna go by the scores tell the truth atleast.

EDIT : Quotes ( dont want to be modded)

I was loving it until, I saw this !!!!

Gamespot must've recieved their payment late.

(Just kidding, don't ban me)

sexy_chimp

LMAO that made me laugh...

and I also quoted you so a mod can see this :twisted:

[QUOTE="nintendofreak_2"][QUOTE="SolidTy"]

You don't know that about FFXIII, SE led everone to believe that FFX was coming out in 2002 back in the day, but it came out last minute in the states right after Xmas 2001.

You don't know when FFXIII coming, so stop guessing. You may be right, you may be wrong, but you don't know.

Also, some of those games are going to TANK big time. Monster Hunter is Hardly and RPG, and it also has no date. It may be coming 2009 as well, yet you named it.

*Oh well, goes back to playing Lost Odysee, a game that's out NOW and stars Forgetful Immortal Kaim*

BlackIsle_rip

That's exactly what I thought when I read it. Bloody hypocrisy. Cows are as arrogant as their masters.

Are you guys serious?? He specifically said FFXIII might come out this year or next year but yet the TC didn't include it in the PS3 list. Where as MH3 also doesn't have a release date and is in the same boat as FFXIII, yet the TC included that one in his Nintendo list.

PS, he never said MH3 is coming out in 2009, he said it might come out...He was pointing out the how the TC logic dint make sense. Reading comprehension is your friend especially if your going to accuse some of being a hypocrite.

Edit: Grammar

Poll dosnt make sense, how can EA buy Naughty Dog if Sony owns them already?

And for the above poster, I think Sony owns guerrila games.