While I'm not the biggest Halo fan, I did load up the first one and play through that about a month ago with a friend. It has never come off as something that was particularly 'milked'.

ODST and Reach came out fairly close to each other but other than that there have been huge gaps in their releases. Call of Duty, on the other hand, genuinely feels as though it's popularity bubble is about to explode (or has exploded) a la Guiter Hero.

it's like saying gears of war 3 will look like this. we know it won't.

I enjoyed Dragon Age a whole lot more. The pacing was infinitely better.

TW2 was good but I don't feel as strongly for it as others. That being said DA:O was ugly as hell.

[QUOTE="SRTtoZ"]

[QUOTE="AtariKidX"] But they utilize Blu-Ray for games on the PS3.Dawq902

You dont get it. 100% of the people who own a PS3 own Blu Ray players...

If the 360 got a blu ray addon, only a marginal % of people would own it. Why would they create games on blu ray if only a few people on 360 could utilize it??

[QUOTE="KoRneYEZ"]

So a guy buys a computer pre-made for 1000$.

Another guy builds a computer on his own using the same components for 650$.

The cost of an item doesn't not necessarily translate into value. Cheap does not equal value. Static high prices also do not equal value. It's not that hard to understand.

Maybe you need to start buying your own stuff before you start going off about how stuff that costs more is better.

shahilsyed

I didn't see any mention of Lost Planet 2 and that crappy train level in the OP. ):

So a guy buys a computer pre-made for 1000$.

Another guy builds a computer on his own using the same components for 650$.

The cost of an item doesn't not necessarily translate into value. Cheap does not equal value. Static high prices also do not equal value. It's not that hard to understand.

Maybe you need to start buying your own stuff before you start going off about how stuff that costs more is better.

TC explain the microsoft Zune.