No, it's not. It may have a unique look, but the game is average at best. Short, too. Way too short.Zeno Clash is EPIC.
Zubinen
Kreone's forum posts
If you liked the demo and you're in this type of games, you should get it. The game had at least a year of steady patch releases and a major addon, so I'm almost certain that most of the bugs were fixed long time ago. The world is huge and fairly well made. I think you'll enjoy it.
Lol, good one.It's called journalism, reporting on the most important event of the weekend and one that concerns millions of gamers - including PC gamers.
Baranga
The problem here is that SoaSE doesn't even have a standard singleplayer campaign, and Anno 1404's campaign is basically a series of tutorial misisons. But if you have a co-op buddy or two to play with, both of these two games can be very exciting. Especially Anno 1404.
For enjoyable singleplayer strategies...Galactic Civilizations II is still a good alternative to Civ IV; Command & Conquer 3: Tiberium Wars still looks good and provides a couple of hours of entertainment.; and I hear the King Arthur games (King Arthur: The Role-playing Wargame, Lionheart: Kings' Crusade, King Arthur: Fallen Champions) are pretty good too, but I haven't tried them myself to say for certain.
[QUOTE="malagahippie"]I tried to download it and you need to pay for the program to be able to get it. Is there one that's free maybe??masterdratI know there's an open source one, but I forgot the name and I can't find it. I will post it if I can remember. http://code.google.com/p/x360ce/ ?
X-Men Origins: Wolverine is another decent PC beat-em-up that comes to mind, though I wouldn't exactly compare its combat system to that of DMC. Don't you own a console? You'd probably fall in love with Bayonetta and Ninja Gaiden.
Perhaps not automatically, but as a rule of thumb? Sure, why not. Aside from the fact that WoW was a game with some rather primitive gameplay mechanics to begin with, I've come to expect a bit more from my games that I did almost a decade ago. Is it that unreasonable to ask for any type of advancement from a 2011/2012 game compared to its 8-to-10-year-old, 56k-dial-up-compatible predecessors? Or to ask it to include some of the features that could already be found in most non-MMORPG games back in the 90s? I don't see why it should be, but maybe you could tell me.So if a game isn't innovative or brings new things to the table then we AUTOMATICALLY write it off as a **** game?
FelipeInside
Log in to comment