LOLuMADzz's forum posts

Avatar image for LOLuMADzz
LOLuMADzz

299

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

7

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 LOLuMADzz
Member since 2008 • 299 Posts

I still get horney every 2 days and I'm 22 -_-

Avatar image for LOLuMADzz
LOLuMADzz

299

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

7

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 LOLuMADzz
Member since 2008 • 299 Posts

I use my condom for protection...

Avatar image for LOLuMADzz
LOLuMADzz

299

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

7

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 LOLuMADzz
Member since 2008 • 299 Posts

the smell of girls who take care of themselves

Avatar image for LOLuMADzz
LOLuMADzz

299

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

7

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 LOLuMADzz
Member since 2008 • 299 Posts

I workout my fingers everyday on console controllers.

Avatar image for LOLuMADzz
LOLuMADzz

299

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

7

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 LOLuMADzz
Member since 2008 • 299 Posts

[QUOTE="LOLuMADzz"]

It's annoying how every thread and another spams 56k in the title when it has pictures and such. People rarely use 56k anymore in the world... Gamespot's is the only place that allows that 56k spam in titles.

JustPlainLucas

First, 56k spam? Second, a LOT of people still use 56k.

Prove it. If it's true, then they wouldn't be browsing gamespot's OT anyway. They'd use their internet on more important issues for them.

It's just being spammed blindlessly in topic titles (like mine unfortunately).

Another reasons would be, many of the OTers are old schoolers so their mind is still stuck in the past. Hence they use this old "title meme".

Also people who generally browse and post here play online - so they have a good connection, not 56k.

Avatar image for LOLuMADzz
LOLuMADzz

299

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

7

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 LOLuMADzz
Member since 2008 • 299 Posts

firefax

Avatar image for LOLuMADzz
LOLuMADzz

299

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

7

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 LOLuMADzz
Member since 2008 • 299 Posts

It's annoying how every thread and another spams 56k in the title when it has pictures and such. People rarely use 56k anymore in the world... Gamespot's is the only place that allows that 56k spam in titles.

Avatar image for LOLuMADzz
LOLuMADzz

299

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

7

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 LOLuMADzz
Member since 2008 • 299 Posts

If I tell you my reasons I'd get banned, if not arrested. :)

Avatar image for LOLuMADzz
LOLuMADzz

299

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

7

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 LOLuMADzz
Member since 2008 • 299 Posts

[QUOTE="error_202"]

What i mean by this is a bad person looks bad and a good/normal person looks good. I mean even if they were dressed smart and what not, Just by looking at them, i could tell if a person is bad and 99% of the time, they are. Has anyone else noticed this.

Even in infant school. The bad kids, looked bad and goods good. Im not talking about dress style, attitude or behaviour. Just straight looking someone in the faces and knowing that they are bad based on how they look.

Which made wonder is there some sort of theory that says how we look like determines what we become? (of course there are the exceptions).

What do you guys think about this?

Snakewiseman

How are you a level 30 with less posts than me??

he reads, reads and reads. viewing topics but not replying is taken into consideration on these forums.

Avatar image for LOLuMADzz
LOLuMADzz

299

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

7

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 LOLuMADzz
Member since 2008 • 299 Posts

It's not always true, I have a friend who isn't goodlooking (below average) but he's a genious in the university classes. But for the most part what you've said is true from my experience. (though some goodlooking people are dumber than donkies :P)