@bobafetthatesu: Why would there not be multiple Xbox One's in a household if you want to gameshare?
Streaming only streams what's playing on the Xbox One, which means one Xbox One can only play one game.... which means that the Windows 10 streaming only plays that one game.... which means you need two consoles in order to gameshare with a friend/family member.
@olddadgamer: Yeah, what'd be the point of buying an Xbox 360 when the One is BC? Plus it's a Blu-Ray player!
I can see why some people would buy a PS3 though. You can play a lot of hits that are only available on it (but most of them will probably be remastered anyway).
@illage2: See, the problem with that belief is that you can still play the game without it. I don't own The Taken King, and won't buy it till it's less than $15-20. I can still play it today though, which is what truly matters in this scenario.
@Saidrex: You know there is more than one store in the world that sells videogames, right? It's not the publisher's fault if a gamer doesn't have the mental capacity to understand that.
1.) You can always find games cheaper than the full price price tag. For example, you can go to greenmangaming and get a copy of Star Wars: Battlefront (2015) for about $45 (last I checked).
Also did you forget not all games are $60 when they first release? Especially indies?
2.) DLC is completely optional, ads are not. Unless you pay a premium which is sometimes an option.
3.) Microtransactions are also optional, ads are not.
You know, adblock wouldn't be such a big issue if a lot of advertisers weren't extremely obnoxious with their ads. There are seriously sites that I cannot continue to go on because they have an ad overlay their site and i can't close it. This is especially horrible on phones.
Using adblock is definitely the lesser evil when compared to software piracy.
How about we just compare jay walkers with serial killers next time?;)
@nikon133: I wish their were Tauntauns as well, but they'd totally be cannon fodder lol.
One thing that does seem to make Hoth as the Rebels slightly more difficult (IMO) is the AT-ST's. They're way too mobile/fast and tanky. They can be taken out easily if a few members cooperate on taking it down, but when it just comes rampaging through the uplink area, you're kinda screwed. :P
@nikon133: You've got to make sure to keep those uplinks on. Once the walkers have been bombed, those turrets (especially the dish looking ones) will do some heavy damage to the AT-AT's. Oribital strikes are also a major help.
I'm sure the sniper might be able to do a bit of damage too, but I've never tried it.
Overall, I'd say whenever I'm on the rebels side, my team usually wins about 40% of the time. The problem is, people act like Walker Assault is a Death Match gametype, and it's not.
LPDisturbedHU's comments