[QUOTE="Lance_Kalzas"][QUOTE="Free_Marxet"]Im not going to play any halo game outside the original trilogy. its all milkage. I liked the first one a lot though.twitchscb

Halo Wars... Really? An RTS based on a FPS world... They might as well have udders on the controller

I was planning to get Gamefly soon and was going to make a list of all the top rated games I might enjoy and want to play, and at the top of the list was Grand Theft Auto 4, the only game with a 10. I am astonished that out of the manyexcellent games on the 360,that this game is on top.

jwgamer119

Im not going to play any halo game outside the original trilogy. its all milkage. I liked the first one a lot though.Free_Marxet

im having problems getting in to a team slayer match at all, it just says i dont have the maps needed to play it, this seams weird since i thought it would let you play it straight away without having to buy anything else. does anyone know what map pack i need to get to make it work?

grumblefunk

Halo's storyline sucks from what I've seen. The book are probably the best. But then again, I don't know why anyone would want to buy those books when there are probably 23424 better sci-fi books.

mD-

[QUOTE="xxThyLordxx"][QUOTE="BioShockOwnz"]

Yeah, probably just another Ninja Gaiden Sigma 2-style port, which it looks you're pretty hyped for.

aia89

Microsoft does not own the Mass Effect property. Bioware does. I also at first thought Microsoft did as well but then one day I was looking at forums on Bioware's website and one of the moderators stated Bioware owns it and anyone posting in their forums that says otherwise will be modded for providing inaccurate information.

@GAMEWIZ21 I'm not going to quote all of that because this post would be a page long. To address your issues, Halo 3:ODST was originally considered an expansion to Halo 3 and I think in Microsoft and Bungie's mind it still is. They're including the Halo 3 multiplayer experience with it with a new mode and then adding story missions. Yes it is going to be a new story arc but they called it an expansion themselves. I'm not really saying Halo has gotten worse and I'm sorry if that's how it came off, I'm just saying that Halo is the same. Multiplayer has seen some fun tweeks and that's why I still own Halo 3 to this day, but there has been no significant innovation in the Halo series. When Call of Duty 4 came out, it was changing the way the series worked and innovating the multiplayer and it has been incredibly successfuly. I'd just like to see the Halo: Reach beta and multiplayer introduce us to something new and fun. Firefight will give us a taste of that, similar to Gears 2's Horde mode and that's a good step, but I want to see Reach bring out a new system as a whole. I would never say that Halo's multiplayer has gotten worse because the match making there is really good, quick and balanced. CNUrGames

[QUOTE="Lance_Kalzas"][QUOTE="MrSlippery39"]

Microsoft doesn't charge for the Map packs, its the developer who does it. The reason why they are free on PC is because the PC map pack was sponsored by some graphics card company.

Johnnylaw47

Nope your still wrong. Bill Gates hasn't worked for microsoft in quite awhile but his money grubbing partners are still there. And if you want to use the "it's a business" excuse because either you don't buy the DLC or arcade games and thus dont care, or for some other reason than please explain why microsofts first DLC was a horse armor for oblivion that cost $5? Can you tell me any reason why horse armor warrants $5 of anyone's money?

No, I'm not wrong. I didn't refer to Horse Armor in particular. I said "Generally speaking...." That means I'm not referring to any particular item plus I listed a few examples in my original post that show the opposite of what you're saying. Did you latch on to the 2nd sentence in my post and ignore the rest?

bungie needs to make a new game outside of halo series halo is garbage Flamingpostman