[QUOTE="Leon2793"]
[QUOTE="mephie25"]
rawsavon
I stated the difference between physically attacking and challenging again, this is semantics which I am not concerned with. I am free to challenge your beliefs you are not exempt, that was my point. I see you seem to have resorted to arguing ad hominem. Yes you may record acts of altruism as a cause of religion but altruism does not always have a religious cause. Many, many awful actions are carried out by religious cause and this is but one of my qualms with it.Never are awful acts carried out by cause of atheism.
1. I just used what you wrote…I can only work with what you give me…you said you were free to attack and inflame…in the broadest sense we are all free to do as we wish, but there are consequences for said actions
2. Altruism had many roots…one of which is religion…you are correct
-but many times religion is the cause…religion does a great deal of good in the world (as well as evil…just like everything else)
3. You say that "Never are awful acts carried out by cause of atheism"
But Atheism is defined as:
In the broadest sense, it is the absence of belief in the existence of deities.
-so any act without a deity as the cause, would be rooted in atheism (both good and bad)
4. I was interested to see your comments on the last part of my last post…I was afraid you would take it as an attack instead of an observation…but you did not say anything about it
I appreciate the ordered response. We may disregard Number one then. I see conflicts and ill created by religion as unnecessary and very avoidable. To fully tell you my justifications for Number two I'd have to go into an incredible amount of detail. I'm a little irked to do that considering I've had two obstinate Jehovah's Witnesses around today.I'm in almost entire agreement with Hitchens so I ask you to consult his books condemning organised religion. If you're so for challenging your beliefs do so with anything produced by Daniel Dennett or Richard Dawkins. I'm sure you see them as a more reliable and venerable figures than I.Number Three is simply inductive reasoning.No I do not have any insecurities or a personal hatred of God. I'm passionate on this issue and that may be mistaken for very negative traits. I disregarded most of it as it was attacking ad hominem.
Log in to comment