[QUOTE="Liberalicide"][QUOTE="Vfanek"][QUOTE="jointed"]

I'm not suggesting anything, just asking a simple question:

If all races are basically the same, why was the Europeans (whites) far superior to the other races when it came to civilized behaviour and technology before they introduced it to the other races?

Again, I'm only asking, and I'm interested in what your answers might be.

Vfanek

Europeans just happened to be the ones that survived. Persia was civilized, just like Ancient Greece. But Philip II was born, and so was his son, Alexander III. Men, jsut as great as Cyrus (the ..creator of Persia), came in the right time, at the right place. What did it lead to? Eastern civilization fell to western hands, having only a half competent king (Darius III), they couldn't stand up on their own. Persia was conquored, and you all know the rest of the story. Alexander died, and his empire scattered. Ruining the Persian civilization, but keeping the western.

Same would have happened if it wasn't for Leonidas and the Spartans, if Xerxes had won, don't you think that today would be a little different? History wouldn't even be recognisable.

from what i gather of the persian empire, it was actually quite lously put together (large numbers, but almost none of them true warriors... rather slaves) and even if the great spartans fell I think someone else could have picked up the slack. Keep in mind the men and women of europe were pretty bad ass back in those times

That is quite - false. The Persian Empire was ruled by a king, and it wasn't more "barbaric" than other nations. Many European coutnries have been far more cruel. Slaves and slaves.. well, many were forced to fight. But it remains in modern times, if the US orders a draft.. will you not be a slave, at least temporarily?

It wasn't a wannabe empire, it was an empire. If it weren't for the Spartans Persia would most surely have occupied Greece. Sparta didn't do much for killing the Persians (sure, twenty thousand is qutie a number.. but was barely a scratch to the Persian army.. physically). What the Spartans did was increasing morale, and did so greatly. The Persians feared the Greeks, who wouldn't after such a terrible blow? While the rest of the Greeks assembled with courage beyond belief. It was probably one of the greatest moral victories in written history.

im not saying it wasnt a great feat for the spartans to do what they did, and eventually what all of greece did. im saying that if a bunch of persians decided to try and take over all of europe, they would have to actually fight ALL of europe. which would b absolutely impossible for them. In my humble opinion.

[QUOTE="jointed"]

I'm not suggesting anything, just asking a simple question:

If all races are basically the same, why was the Europeans (whites) far superior to the other races when it came to civilized behaviour and technology before they introduced it to the other races?

Again, I'm only asking, and I'm interested in what your answers might be.

Vfanek

Europeans just happened to be the ones that survived. Persia was civilized, just like Ancient Greece. But Philip II was born, and so was his son, Alexander III. Men, jsut as great as Cyrus (the ..creator of Persia), came in the right time, at the right place. What did it lead to? Eastern civilization fell to western hands, having only a half competent king (Darius III), they couldn't stand up on their own. Persia was conquored, and you all know the rest of the story. Alexander died, and his empire scattered. Ruining the Persian civilization, but keeping the western.

Same would have happened if it wasn't for Leonidas and the Spartans, if Xerxes had won, don't you think that today would be a little different? History wouldn't even be recognisable.

from what i gather of the persian empire, it was actually quite lously put together (large numbers, but almost none of them true warriors... rather slaves) and even if the great spartans fell I think someone else could have picked up the slack. Keep in mind the men and women of europe were pretty bad ass back in those times 

liberalicide i have a question what if one is 100% white but is not full french and has some other white cultures. where can he live in europe and can he live in a different euro country and adapt their culture and languge and live there like them? MeriMorganov

if someone is white, then I suggest they live in their native homeland along with people of all races doing the same. The only time I think merging of two cultures would be okay is if lets say country 1 is about to collapse and country 2 decideds its gonna take over to ensure a stabe enviroment for the people.

Liberalicide? What are you talking about?

In America, liberals and conservatives have essentially the same views in things like censorship and gay rights. It varies from person to person, not party to party. Liberals and conservatives, however, have economically different views.

Greatgone12

liberals and conservatives have essentially become something very different than what they should be.

in reality, there shouldnt even be partisan politics. the only role the government should play is protecting our people and makign sure we have a stable economy 

Race is essentially nonexistent. Skin color is, as assumed, only skin deep. The reason these White Nationalists act like the arrogant pig-asses they are is because they're getting culture mixed up with race. Greatgone12

theres a huge difference between people of different races.

if africans can get sickle cell and whites cant why wouldnt you be open to the possibility of inherit social differences?

im not saying one is smarter, or one is better. but we have different ways of operating. Both should be valued. it seems like theres two different groups of people around today

1. Racists who hate

2. Anti-Racists who have a totally nihilistic view point of humanity. 

I however, like life and the differences we all have. and Id like to see the african bushmen continue to do there thing while my own irish kin get to do their own thing as well. 

[QUOTE="Liberalicide"]

 

its pretty simple really. I love how you're really trying to push your liberal/pseduo-commie agenda onto me. But when it comes down to it, you really dont have a clue. BranKetra

 

but heres the deal. Yeah cultures are all off spring of one and other but over time they eventually appear distinct. the same way you get irishmen who have a totally different culture than the russians. Language works the same way. All european languages except iberian is "Indo-European". at one time there was one "european" language, and it branched off into celtic, germanic, slavic (with the appropriate branches off all of them including english etc)

 

we white nationalists believe all people on this earth have a right to there native culture. the time of conquerors are over, and we should be happy that the world has so many different people. But at the same time we need to embrace ourselves as well.

Liberalicide

That's like saying that since Bruce Lee developed his own style of martial arts, Jeet Kune Do, which originally branched from Kung Fu, it shouldn't be changed....even though a style is meant to adapt and change. Culture is the same. I have to go to work until 9:00 P.M., so I'll continue later.

Culture not being allowed to change is like evolution being controlled after people get what they want; It's not supposed to happen.

actually liberal isnt synonymous with change, liberal is synonymous with freedom. But in american politics both sides are supposed to favor freedom and the left tends to favor big government with lots of political correctness and censorship (But ill admit the neocons who pretend to be on the right do the same thing)

in essence jeet kune do cant change, because in reality is open to everything.

multiculturalism means the death of all cultures, because its impossible to actually have many cultures living in one nation. one will always become dominant.  

[QUOTE="Liberalicide"]

[QUOTE="MattUD1"]Well, according to Liberalicide (kill the liberals?) since Russia is keeping it's "roots", they should all move there! MattUD1

thats not what white nationalists believe though. why would nationalists move to a country thats not there native nation? white nationalists even oppose the polish going to ireland, even though white nationalists love the polish. They would just prefer to keep all cultures on this planet pure.

I dont think I ever said roots, because after that whole communist stint russia has seemingly forgotten its roots. I just said they are the only ones doing anything about immigration to their country. 

[QUOTE="Liberalicide"]

[QUOTE="MattUD1"]Well, according to Liberalicide (kill the liberals?) since Russia is keeping it's "roots", they should all move there! BranKetra

thats not what white nationalists believe though. why would nationalists move to a country thats not there native nation? white nationalists even oppose the polish going to ireland, even though white nationalists love the polish. They would just prefer to keep all cultures on this planet pure.

its pretty simple really. I love how you're really trying to push your liberal/pseduo-commie agenda onto me. But when it comes down to it, you really dont have a clue.

but heres the deal. Yeah cultures are all off spring of one and other but over time they eventually appear distinct. the same way you get irishmen who have a totally different culture than the russians. Language works the same way.  All european languages except iberian is "Indo-European". at one time there was one "european" language, and it branched off into celtic, germanic, slavic (with the appropriate branches off all of them including english etc) 

we white nationalists believe all people on this earth have a right to there native culture. the time of conquerors are over, and we should be happy that the world has so many different people. But at the same time we need to embrace ourselves as well. 

Well, according to Liberalicide (kill the liberals?) since Russia is keeping it's "roots", they should all move there! MattUD1

thats not what white nationalists believe though. why would nationalists move to a country thats not there native nation? white nationalists even oppose the polish going to ireland, even though white nationalists love the polish. They would just prefer to keep all cultures on this planet pure.  

Idiots and their racial biology...:roll:CptJSparrow

care to explain that in further detail? there are a lot of inherit differences between the races, wether you think that some are bad is up to you. I personally dont believe any race is bad, but I definately am aware of the difference.