[QUOTE="Treflis"]Imagine this scenario A teacher is ridiculed daily by his or her students, They show no respect, toss back remarks and overall makes her work day difficult. They spread rumors and so on. Now Let's say this teacher also has a very troublesome private life, Husband's cheating on her, death in the family that she's still not over along with her getting more and more stressed and declining mentally. One day she snaps, in Class. She walks over to the Door, locks it and then draw her weapon and start shooting the students. Then what? Should students start carrying firearms?, imagine how many school shooting would take place then. How many would get rid of a bully by walking up behind them and just pull the trigger? Or should all the kids wear kevlar?, to learn that as soon as they step outside of the door they can be killed, in fact even at home they're not safe. What kind of country would that be when your first lesson is that you can be killed at any given time by anyone, even the ones next to you in class? That would make sense if I didn;t say clearly that we would have OFFICERS with GUNS patroling the SCHOOL on SHIFTS. Where did a teacher getting a gun come from? The anti-gun defense force does this all the time, trying to confuse people with thinks unrelated. Like Video games.
Two Brooklyn thieves were caught mid-robbery after confusing a bathroom for an exit. The would-be robbery took place at Gourmet Buffalo Deli, and NYPD officers Mark Xylas and Favio Quizhpi found the two suspects beating an employee. When they yelled "POLICE! DROP YOUR GUNS!" both men made a break for what they believed was the exit. Unfortunately, both suspects made the stupid mistake of trying to escape through the deli's clearly-marked bathroom. After realizing that their stupidity had cost them their freedom, both men dropped their guns and were arrested. Police confiscated a .32 caliber Rossi revolver and a .45 caliber Hi-point semi-automatic weapon. 20-year-old Isaiah Henderson and 23-year-old James Gillespie were charged with criminal possession of a weapon, unlawful imprisonment, menacing and robbery.
Schools should be entitled protective reliability. In other words, certain districts should have certain officers go through School related areas during the day on their shifts as well as have a certain group to be able to go to that area if there is any crime at or around the area near the school. Equal protection is key, and I was reading some threads here and the people that don't believe it will not solve anything make no sense. The most common complaint of negative altitude is that kids will have ACCESS to guns, but that makes no sense to me. It's more a rule of fear than anything else preventing them from even thinking about it and will make them feel safer. I do believe that very limited, maximum of 2 should represent each school. Although i also believe this depends on the size of the school of how they are represented with the amount of officers. I do think they should increase regular security but a couple though as those are very few in schools that need them, and they could stop or prevent crimes just as much as actual officers. Just something to think about.
Log in to comment