As much as I love UC2, it's obvious GeoW3 looks better. I played both and it's superior in textures (MP wise). But going from UC3, it aims to be better, so uh, lets wait till June, mmkay?
[QUOTE="drinkerofjuice"] If this was a serious post, then I feel sorry for you.
kieranb2000
Why wouldn't i be serious? Stop relying on nostalgia and play some real games for once, and then maybe you'll stop denying the fact that cinematic movie-like experiences are the future of gaming. Platformers that rely on level design and pure entertainment should die already, and also, i think we all know that 2D games are horrible and rely solely on nostalgia. 3D is were its at.
CoD, Uncharted, Gears of War and mature gaming is the future, accept that fact and enjoy games for what they are.
I majorly disagree with you, and feel really bad for you. You would rather have a cinematic game with poorly designed levels and no actual fun from a gameplay standpoint rather than games designed around the idea of being fun to play. I'm really glad that people like you aren't game developers else every game would be crap like Heavy Rain.....
[QUOTE="DarkLink77"] Compared to platformers this gen? Um... yeah. Or last gen. Or the gen before.DarkLink77
was that your main problem with it? the linearness...ness.....ess... because i fell like people here hate games that are linear
Platformers in which you can only jump on certain things and succeed in certain ways because that's what the developer wants you to do are lame.But it's not a platformer... it's a TPS....
[QUOTE="caseystryker"][QUOTE="JIGGADOG420"] the multiplayer maps are pretty cool in part 2.rasengan2552
Seriously? Bioshock 2's MP maps were terribly boring and the multiplayer gameplay was even worse. why are people even associating Bioshock 2 with the first ? two is an abomination, it is its own game.Well to be fair, 2 did have a better ending than 1.
Log in to comment