Lord_Frijoles' forum posts

  • 38 results
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
Avatar image for Lord_Frijoles
Lord_Frijoles

38

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 Lord_Frijoles
Member since 2012 • 38 Posts

[QUOTE="Lord_Frijoles"][QUOTE="ShadowMoses900"]

No they don't. Switzerland is a very gun friendly country, even more gun friendly than the US. The reason why is because they were being thretened by the Nazi's, and guess what? Switzerland was the ONLY country near Germany to not be attacked by the Germans. You know why? They had guns, lot's and lot's of guns. In fact banning guns was one of the first thing hitler did. Stalin and Mao did the same thing later on, but this isn't about them at the moment.

"This year will go down in history. For the first time, a civilized nation has full gun registration. Our streets will be safer, our police more efficient, and the world will follow our lead into the future!? - Adolph Hitler 1935, on The Weapons Act of Nazi Germany

Sound Familar?

"Tough gun control keeps guns out of wrong hands and protects our children"-Hilary Clinton

No I am not saying she is a nazi, but it's the same exact argument Hitler made.

ShadowMoses900

It's actually easier in the U.S. And for the love of God, say no to Godwin's Law.

Stop trying to downplay it. Hitler said it, he said banning guns would be good because it would make Germany safer. People who want to ban guns today use the same argument. The TC even used the same argument.

There was a reason Hitler never touched Switzerland, they had GUNS. The people would fight back. You know what's funny? What do you do when a criminal is after you? You call the cops, why? Because they have GUNS. You call people WITH GUNS to stop people who are trying to hurt you.

Seriosly your logic makes no sense. And I thought you got banned?

Are you drinking, or is English your fifth language?
Avatar image for Lord_Frijoles
Lord_Frijoles

38

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 Lord_Frijoles
Member since 2012 • 38 Posts

[QUOTE="Lord_Frijoles"][QUOTE="theone86"]

Switzerland also has tighter gun laws than the U.S.

theone86

That, they do. Sort of. Slightly more strict than the U.S., far more liberal than European counterpart. Not to mention, assault weapon ownership is mandatory. HOWEVER, tighter gun laws != eliminating guns, which the opening poster seems to want to do. For perspective, the gun ownership rate in Finland is twice that in Mexico, and thrice that in Switzerland. Compare gun homicide rates, and there clearly seems to be quite a few things at play.

Yes, but it's mandatory because every male is conscripted into a reserve corps. Let's see if that flies over here.

I don't advocate banning guns. Though the OP might, I think he was more talking hypothetically such as if we could snap our fingers and all guns would simply disappear.

Yes, I am aware that they are conscripted, and am not supporting the idea. My posts directed at the opening poster have been focused primarily on criticizing the notion of outright eliminating all firearms, which he has been pushing. If he doesn't actually support the idea, then I'll be rather surprised.
Avatar image for Lord_Frijoles
Lord_Frijoles

38

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 Lord_Frijoles
Member since 2012 • 38 Posts

[QUOTE="Lord_Frijoles"][QUOTE="theone86"]

Switzerland also has tighter gun laws than the U.S.

ShadowMoses900

That, they do. Sort of. Slightly more strict than the U.S., far more liberal than European counterpart. Not to mention, assault weapon ownership is mandatory. HOWEVER, tighter gun laws != eliminating guns, which the opening poster seems to want to do. For perspective, the gun ownership rate in Finland is twice that in Mexico, and thrice that in Switzerland. Compare gun homicide rates, and there clearly seems to be quite a few things at play.

No they don't. Switzerland is a very gun friendly country, even more gun friendly than the US. The reason why is because they were being thretened by the Nazi's, and guess what? Switzerland was the ONLY country near Germany to not be attacked by the Germans. You know why? They had guns, lot's and lot's of guns. In fact banning guns was one of the first thing hitler did. Stalin and Mao did the same thing later on, but this isn't about them at the moment.

"This year will go down in history. For the first time, a civilized nation has full gun registration. Our streets will be safer, our police more efficient, and the world will follow our lead into the future!? - Adolph Hitler 1935, on The Weapons Act of Nazi Germany

Sound Familar?

"Tough gun control keeps guns out of wrong hands and protects our children"-Hilary Clinton

No I am not saying she is a nazi, but it's the same exact argument Hitler made.

It's actually easier in the U.S. And for the love of God, say no to Godwin's Law.
Avatar image for Lord_Frijoles
Lord_Frijoles

38

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 Lord_Frijoles
Member since 2012 • 38 Posts

[QUOTE="ShadowMoses900"]

[QUOTE="theone86"]

Switzerland also has tighter gun laws than the U.S.

theone86

Switzerland has some of the most laxed gun laws in the world, kids can even carry guns over there. What are you talking about?

For The Record : Guns Are Good

It's pretty funny and destroys anti gun loonies arguments completely. I recommend you all watch it, if you do and still try to argue that banning guns would make us safer then just lol at you.

They actually have more restrictions on concealed carrying and more rigorous requirements for background checks than the U.S. Something like the stand your ground law would never fly in Switzerland, either, as they place an increased burden on gun owners to use them in a responsible manner.

Conceal carry permit holders really aren't the driving cause of gun crime. They account for less than 1% of it. That said, there are some practical ideas which can be taken from Switzerland.
Avatar image for Lord_Frijoles
Lord_Frijoles

38

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 Lord_Frijoles
Member since 2012 • 38 Posts

[QUOTE="Lord_Frijoles"]Switzerland has a p. high firearm ownership rate. So do the Scandinavian countries. I don't think that the opening poster is very intelligent. theone86

Switzerland also has tighter gun laws than the U.S.

That, they do. Sort of. Slightly more strict than the U.S., far more liberal than European counterpart. Not to mention, assault weapon ownership is mandatory. HOWEVER, tighter gun laws != eliminating guns, which the opening poster seems to want to do. For perspective, the gun ownership rate in Finland is twice that in Mexico, and thrice that in Switzerland. Compare gun homicide rates, and there clearly seems to be quite a few things at play.
Avatar image for Lord_Frijoles
Lord_Frijoles

38

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 Lord_Frijoles
Member since 2012 • 38 Posts
[QUOTE="Lord_Frijoles"][QUOTE="-Sun_Tzu-"] Just because beans isn't here doesn't mean you aren't going to get called out for being ban dodging scum-Sun_Tzu-
i hacked beans' account, so he's not going to be online for a few days. he can suck it.

:roll:

go troll another forum
Avatar image for Lord_Frijoles
Lord_Frijoles

38

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 Lord_Frijoles
Member since 2012 • 38 Posts

[QUOTE="Lord_Frijoles"]Switzerland has a p. high firearm ownership rate. So do the Scandinavian countries. I don't think that the opening poster is very intelligent. BluRayHiDef

You're a fool. Just becuase guns aren't a problem in another country does not mean they aren't a problem at all. For example, it would be best if all nuclear weapons were destroyed even though nuclear weapons are practically never used. Why? Because despite their lack of use, they are indeed a (potential) problem. The same logic applies to guns.

You, sir, are a genuine idiot. Fortunately, everyone, including yourself, agrees with me on that particular point of discussion. Actually, the remarkably low gun violence rates in countries with reasonably high gun ownership rates does mean that guns are not inherently the problem. The issue is that there are cross-national discrepancies that account for the disparity of gun crime. The problem is not guns nor nuclear weapons, but the undesirable consequences of them and the preventable causal factors. Apparently said causal factors aren't only guns, considering the gun crime rates in other countries are negligible.
Avatar image for Lord_Frijoles
Lord_Frijoles

38

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 Lord_Frijoles
Member since 2012 • 38 Posts

[QUOTE="Lord_Frijoles"][QUOTE="-Sun_Tzu-"] lol another banjo alt -Sun_Tzu-

Just because beans isn't here doesn't mean you aren't going to get called out for being ban dodging scum

i hacked beans' account, so he's not going to be online for a few days. he can suck it.
Avatar image for Lord_Frijoles
Lord_Frijoles

38

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 Lord_Frijoles
Member since 2012 • 38 Posts
Switzerland has a p. high firearm ownership rate. So do the Scandinavian countries. I don't think that the opening poster is very intelligent.
Avatar image for Lord_Frijoles
Lord_Frijoles

38

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 Lord_Frijoles
Member since 2012 • 38 Posts
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAhaha I'm going to India
  • 38 results
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4