LordelX's forum posts

Avatar image for LordelX
LordelX

1376

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

63

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#1 LordelX
Member since 2004 • 1376 Posts

@ttualumni13:

Actually, that's an excellent point. The system's physical design was pretty atrocious, no matter what color it was. If it would've looked more like a Wii, that probably would've made a difference.

Avatar image for LordelX
LordelX

1376

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

63

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#2  Edited By LordelX
Member since 2004 • 1376 Posts

@lilkarlh666:

I was long out of school by the time the Gamecube was around so I only experienced what you explained through game magazines and gamespot threads, such as this. I think you're right, I think the Nintendo "image" problem really started with the Gamecube. When I was in uni, it was PS1 vs N64, but the PS1 really didn't have the image of a more mature system because many of the best FPS of that generation were only on the N64. I haven't been to game shop in decades, so it's depressing to hear it's all about FIFA, Call of Duty and tracksuits. By the way, I'm 38 and I'm enjoying Pokémon X as well.

Avatar image for LordelX
LordelX

1376

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

63

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#3 LordelX
Member since 2004 • 1376 Posts

#@turtlethetaffer:

There's always been a lot of speculation as to what would have made the Gamecube more successful. I started this thread to see if opinions have changed over time.

Compared to a lot of other games SMS is great. Super Mario Sunshine is also widely considered the worst of the Mario 3D platformers. It was a low point in the series.

Avatar image for LordelX
LordelX

1376

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

63

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#4  Edited By LordelX
Member since 2004 • 1376 Posts

Of course, that statement itself is misleading, because the Gamecube didn’t need saving. It made a profit for Nintendo and over twenty million were sold worldwide. While that’s not a failure, the Gamecube placed third place in the sixth console generation. A lot of video game fans had a lot of strong opinions about what Nintendo did wrong.

Here are five big misconceptions about what people thought would have saved the Gamecube from third place in the console race.

5. Super Mario Sunshine at launch

It’s fairly clear now that Super Mario Sunshine being available at launch would not have had a significant impact of the Gamecube’s overall lifetime sales. It may have sold a few more units at launch, but Super Mario Sunshine’s problems would have exacerbated the Gamecube’s negative image if it would have launched with the system. Although Luigi’s Mansion was a disappointing launch game for some, Rogue Leader really made a great case to own a Gamecube. Super Mario Sunshine with its G-rated image, yet not enough variety of environments for hardcore Mario fans and too difficult a game for children, would not have made a good case to own a Gamecube.

4. Larger storage capacity

Another popular criticism was that the Gamecube’s mini disc storage capacity was too small. Capable of holding only 1.5 gigabytes compared to the 4.7 gigabytes of a standard DVD, many said that the Gamecube was being deprived of many large third party games. In retrospect, this doesn’t seem to be a valid argument as we know now that many of the most popular games the skipped the Gamecube in the sixth generation were not usually much larger that 1.5 gigabytes. Many large games for the Gamecube shipped with multiple discs. Swapping discs doesn’t seem to make or break a console as it didn’t negatively affect the Playstation 1.

3. Keeping Rare and/or Silicon Knights

In retrospect, it’s quite easy to see why Nintendo made the decisions it did about Rare and Silicon Knights. Neither studio has released a game anywhere near the quality of software they were releasing in the N64/Gamecube days. According to rumor, many of Rare’s key staff had already left when Nintendo sold its shares to the Stampers who sold the company to Microsoft. Nintendo had a contract with Silicon Knights to produce exclusive games for the Gamecube and when the contract was finished, Nintendo did not renew. Seeing Silicon Knight’s game for the Xbox 360 Too Human, it’s easy to see why.

2. Online Play

In North America, the Gamecube had two online games, and a handful of others in Japan. While online gaming on the PS2 and Xbox was starting to take off with a select few number of titles, Nintendo really didn’t have a first party game that would have befitted from online play outside of Mariokart: Double Dash and maybe Super Smash Bros. Melee. Being able to play Tony Hawk, Madden, Splinter Cell or Rainbow Six online would have made good bullet points on the back of the box, but a majority of players who play those games seriously would have been playing on another console. Nintendo really didn’t have an online title capable of taking on experiences offered by Halo 2, Final Fantasy XI or the World of Warcraft. If Nintendo titles had had online play, the Gamecube’s installed base would not have increased significantly because of it.

1. Grand Theft Auto

The biggest misconception is that if the Grand Theft Auto series had been released on Gamecube, the Gamecube would have sold millions of units more. A Grand Theft Auto release on the Gamecube would not have moved systems off store shelves. The biggest indicator of this is the fact that Grand Theft Auto releasing on Xbox did not have that effect. Grand Theft Auto sold moderately on the Xbox but not nearly as much as Rockstar had hoped. Grand Theft Auto releases on the GBA and DS have gotten a tepid response from consumers. Even the release of Grand Theft Auto IV did not see a surge of seventh generation adopters buying systems, despite the game selling millions. Even if Grand Theft Auto III had been exclusive to the Gamecube, there is a good chance the Gamecube might have become the number #2 console in North America and Europe but would not have toppled Sony from #1. Even a game such as Grand Theft Auto wouldn’t be able to convince consumers to ignore Halo, Final Fantasy, Grand Turismo and God of War. To put it in simple terms, Grand Theft Auto would have done for the Gamecube what Grand Theft Auto V would do for the Wii U. Very little.

What do you think? Do you disagree, or do you have some different ideas of what could have been regarding the Gamecube.

Avatar image for LordelX
LordelX

1376

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

63

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#5 LordelX
Member since 2004 • 1376 Posts

You do make many excellent points. But what you consider an landmark title and what others consider a landmark title are definately in conflict. Some think that Wii Sports and Wii Fit are some of Miyamoto's crowning achievements. And though I don't particularily enjoy either title myself, I can't disagree with that sentiment....those titles have changed console gaming forever.

Avatar image for LordelX
LordelX

1376

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

63

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#6 LordelX
Member since 2004 • 1376 Posts
Thank you so much. I really appreciate it.
Avatar image for LordelX
LordelX

1376

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

63

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#7 LordelX
Member since 2004 • 1376 Posts

I was wondering if anyone knew the time that the Playstation Store gets updated? It's already September 25th....and no Megaman 9. Not that I usually wait for games to hit the Playstation store the minute they get released, but I took the day off work to play this. Maybe because it's the Canadian store it's released later?

Thank you for answering my question.

Avatar image for LordelX
LordelX

1376

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

63

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#8 LordelX
Member since 2004 • 1376 Posts

Meh. Another fanboy obsessing about his game machine. The PS3 doesn't need the be #1 in the console race, it needs to make truckloads of money for Sony and third parties, then you'll see a wider variety of games and exclusives.

Being #1 doesn't matter anymore. Look at Nintendo. They're back on top, and almost nothing has changed since the days of Gamecube.

Quit writing corperate propoganda and go do something more useful with your time, like playing your cherished PS3.

Avatar image for LordelX
LordelX

1376

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

63

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#9 LordelX
Member since 2004 • 1376 Posts
Oblivion: Game of the Year
Avatar image for LordelX
LordelX

1376

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

63

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#10 LordelX
Member since 2004 • 1376 Posts

I tend to think the people who rate certain games low around here (like you guys, not the 'quote unquote'experts) and complain about the graphics are probably not playing in HD. I find that hard to believe and a damn shame. GTA IV and MGS IV are the best looking games, without a doubt, EVER. I've been playing for almost 20 years, since I got an NES when it first came out and every system from then on. Check out my profile and game collection if you dont believe me. I can't stand reading a negative review about those two games in particular...

I had to get an HDTV when I got a PS3. I couldn't stand playing it on a regular TV knowing that it could look a little better if I was playing in HD. My question is how can some of you people say these games don't look good when the graphics CAN'T get any better?!? The whiners must NOT BE PLAYING IN HD.

Are you playing in HD or not?

And if not, WHY NOT?!?

GarysLaptop

What are you, some sort of jerk? The reason I don't have an HDTV is because I have more important things to spend my money on. My Widescreen Sony Trinitron is displays an excellent picture.

HD doesn't change draw-in, frame rate hitchs or lag. If you're blow away by anything in HD, that's your problem. If you can't keep it to yourself, don't accuse people of playing in SD of rating games lower. Everyone has the right to voice their opinion. If you don't like it, go start your own gaming site. You can call it: IworshipHD.com