Lyphe2k's forum posts
I don't like to be pessimistic about these things but I would prefer if the next gen handheld did away with 3D in place of... I don't know something else. The 3D was cute and all but on to the next gimmick.
Â
Not for nothing though, I just don't see much of a point in 3d on a handheld. Considering you have to be fixated on one angle to get good experience sounds against the point of owning a handheld, especially one that also has motion sensitivity built in. I mean the touch screen worked well enough and if a dual-screen handheld with touch sensitivity wasn't enough, it also features 3D view, which now makes the DS feel like a circus.
Â
If it remains optional I don't really care but truthfully I hope the next handheld's selling point is not in that it has 3D features because thus far has not done much for the 3DS. The dual-screen and touch screen compatibility sounded risky at first but worked out beautifully. They didn't half-ass it and make touch screen optional. They didn't include a removable screen to make the dual-screens optional. But yet it feels like even Nintendo was so uncertain about 3D that they decided to include an optional switch.
[QUOTE="bonesawisready5"]Hey JaysonGuy, Nintendo has $8.8 billion in cash on hand. They have ZERO debt. You were saying?Toxic-SeahorseDon't you not know jaysonguy? He will NEVER answer to a post that is factual or proves him wrong. I've done so many times and he just disappears. Hell, he might not even reply to this thread at all. He's a troll and nothing more. I mean, he's not totally wrong lol. Sure, Nintendo may not go bankrupt due to the Wii U but honestly, Nintendo is still a business and I assume would like to profit as much as they can, right?
Log in to comment