I think Richard Dawkins is an intelligent man who has cashed in his integrity in favor of feeding the mindless sheep who like to think they're not mindless sheep. He makes atheism seem relevant, but fortunately, it's so mainstream that any person who doesn't give a **** can just adopt it. No, only the researched intellects who steal every argument they find off the Internet in an attempt to impress those don't care nearly as much are intelligent enough to see it. Without his religious hate and controversy, he'd just be another science teacher selling biology books.
Then it's your fault for not making your "point" clear. - - I'm sorry I don't view America as the entire world like you apparently do (and like the rest of atheists who seem to ignore the destructive nature of the Islamic world), but I'm rational.-
[QUOTE="Makalano"] Another argument constantly brought up is the "equal rights for homosexuals." Let's keep in mind that homosexuals are not denied any basic rights. In fact, they have just as many rights as straight people. They can marry people of the opposite sex; they just don't want to. Likewise, straight people can't marry people of their own sex; they just don't want to. DroidPhysX
In the united states, at least 40 states deny the right for homosexuals to marry.
Youre reasoning and logic is severely flawed.
And in Malawi, farting in public is a crime. America's laws=/=The rest of the world's laws.
So does that mean a reviewer can never say anything in a review that is wrong or incorrect just because it's his opinion? I'm not saying McShea is wrong, I'm just asking if people think reviewers can do no wrong. I look at reviewers as people who are passionate and opinionated about the past present and future of games and offer their insight, or opinion as to how good or bad a game is within thier own beliefs.... no i dont think a reviewer can be "wrong" but i certainly have earned the right to disagree based on my own experience. Im not about to blame someone for an opinion. "Wrong"but is factual... "disagree" is a matter of objection... Just shut up, man. You're the only one going on about it. :|
It's one thing to be an atheist; it's another to constantly flaunt your atheism at any given opportunity. Over and over again, I hear the same arguments on both sides, but it seems like the atheists seem to be the ones that want to tear down the foundation of Christianity (not religion as a whole; just Christianity, the most harmless mainstream religion in today's world) for... what gain exactly? I sincerely doubt it's based on good intentions, but rather the idea that an atheist is a well educated, independent individual. Most of the terror inflicted by Christianity dates hundreds of years back, and are still the basis for just about every argument on why "religion is bad." If everyone suddenly stopped believing in God, it would not change what happened all those years back. Yes, people still do terrible things in the name of good, but atheists are quick to ignore the good it does (reinforces good behavior, makes one's life feel it has meaning, creates a community). Such tragedies as the lady drowning her children because "God told her to" has more to do with the fact that she's insane rather than Christianity. Another argument constantly brought up is the "equal rights for homosexuals." Let's keep in mind that homosexuals are not denied any basic rights. In fact, they have just as many rights as straight people. They can marry people of the opposite sex; they just don't want to. Likewise, straight people can't marry people of their own sex; they just don't want to. But I disgress. This crusade for equal rights seems to be more of an attempt to feel relevant rather than actually helping homosexuals attain equal rights. Atheists seem to think that all Christians are against gay marriage, when, in fact, this is not the case. Some peoples' religion doesn't influence harmful actions in any way, only good, but they atheists still feel the need to attack the whole of the religion. And even then, the ones that are against it don't necessarily go on about it or even disapprove someone mentions they're gay They don't care as much as atheists seem to think. Yes, we all know religion has made many people do terrible things (although atheists still never seem to stop talking about it), but what about particular individuals have only done good due because their religion? What about the people that aren't against gay marriage or stem cell research? What about the people that take great comfort in reading God's word? Or the people who feel inspired to help those in need when the priest in church reminds them that that was God's purpose (cooperation)? So what is it? Is it really because you want to eliminate some "evil" from the world, or are just looking to exert your superiority/supposed sense of intelligence/need to argue? I don't mean to be inflammatory, but GENERALLY, atheists are perceived as very pretentious, much like how Omegle users are GENERALLY perceived as pathetic perverts.
I say Alice: Madness Returns. The year is not over yet, but usually November is just packed with blockbuster titles, and December's line-up is practically non-existent. What say you? Edit: I don't really consider Dark Souls a sleeper hit. It will be my favorite game of all time once I get it. Demon's Souls is currently my favorite game of all time.
Log in to comment