[QUOTE="Making_Pudding"]

Yet another misinformed person that thinks that 10/10 means the game is perfect.

10/10 means the game is as close to being perfect as a game can be. No proffessional site nor magazine will ever tell you that a game is perfect. Ever.

eagles_band

You are misinformed, 10/10 is a perfect score. If it was close to perfect, then it shouldnt get a perfect score.

Yet another misinformed person that thinks that 10/10 means the game is perfect.

10/10 means the game is as close to being perfect as a game can be. No proffessional site nor magazine will ever tell you that a game is perfect. Ever.

. Personally I'm bored as hell by call of duty games. kill die respawn kill die respawn... and the missions are always just go from point a to point b with the same action the whole time. and stories? its either "TERRORIST SCUM HAVE INVADED (random middle east country)" in MW or the same old WW2 story we know and love in W@W...lazy_trash

Killing. Dying. Respawning. Happens in every shooter.Hell, it happens in every game, period.

Going from point A to point B. Also happens in every shooter. That's kind of the point of playing a game about war. It's about advancing forward.

Same action the whole time? Well, I can't argue with you there. The action in Call of Duty will only be the same if you let it be the same. You're free to pick up a new weapon whenever you want. If you're complaining that the GAMEPLAY is always the same, well, then I don't know what to tell you. I guess you want the game to turn into an RPG halfway through, or something of the sort.

Also, the story is about a rebel uprising that overthrew and killed the leader of a middle-eastern country. Now they're taking over. It's not about terrorists invading a country. If anything, it's closer to a civil war.

Im expecting more of the same, but with better multiplayer improvements... c'mon, let's be honest, Call of Duty is only good for multiplayer nowadays... the good ol' Call of Duty 2 was great on single player and multiplayer, but even though COD 4 has awesome multiplayer, I wish the single player had more to offer.meconate

Are you actually saying that the campaign in Call of Duty 2 was a better experience than Call of Duty 4's campaign? Think carefully about what you're saying. You're saying that the loosely connected levels in COD 2 are better than the cinematic storyline in COD 4 simply because you can spend about one more hour playing Call of Duty 2's campaign. I would say that's borderline delusional.

No, you didn't see the article? IW already basically confirmed that the campaign would be about the same length, how they 'don't want to stretch out the story'.Legendaryscmt

I don't blame them. I've played too many games that jump the shark on their storyline. Off the top of my head, I would say that Half-Life 2, Halo 3, and Dark Sector are games that made me lose interest halfway through their respective campaigns. A longer game doesn't mean a better game. It means a longer game.

But, on topic, I'm expecting great things from this one. Infinity Ward doesn't disappoint. They're saying that the game looks better than Call of Duty 4 and still runs at 60 frames per second. I'm super-hyped.

2 is worth playing as is World at War. Both have fun single players, but you have probably played the best one already in MW.senses_fail_06

actually he is also in the original call of duty game on pc but he dies on a nazi battleship.NOVACAINE54

[QUOTE="DannyCoolX7"][QUOTE="DaveyBoy123"]As stated by others above: MGS4 is the only reason i want a ps3x-2tha-z