[QUOTE="Maneil99"][QUOTE="muscleserge"] UE4 before the PS4 had the full feature set, after the PS4 demo, features were removed from all versions of the engine. sounds legit. Also why would I upgrade in a few years when my 7970 is already faster that both x1 and PS4 GPUs put together, and my phenom x6 wipes the floor with the Jaguar. So allthe points I made aren't true? why don't you elaborate.muscleserge
What you wrote is hilarious, you don't get it at all. Remember the faster graphics cards from 2005? http://www.xbitlabs.com/articles/graphics/display/2005-17gpu_14.html#sect0 None of those meet minimu, requirements, games like Crysis released in 2007 killed those cards. Your 7970 will not last the duration of the gen unless you want o be playing on low settings midway through. Your comparing your X6 which does compute tasks brute force style due to zero optimiaztion to a unlrealesed Console GPU. Wow ignorance is stunning. The Fact that the next gen consoles have 8 cores and they are CONSOLES means devs can specificly make games to run well on each core. You think a 7770 and a crappy 8 core cpu would be able to get 60 fps on BF4 at 720p? My old 6870 ( faster then a 7770) Didn't even get 60 fps on BF3 on high.
"Many PC gamers have blamed consoles for not being powerful enough to run Unreal Engine 4s Global Illumination tech. In an interview with GameTrailers, Epic Games Tim Sweeney decided to shed some light on that matter.
Epic Games Global Illumination technique is called Sparse Voxel Octree Global Illumination (SVOGI), a technique that was developed by Andrew Scheidecker. Despite what Epic Games showcased at last years GDC, it seems that this technique is too heavy for actual games.
Sweeney told GameTrailers that SVOGI was extremely expensive. Therefore, Epic Games decided to create a series of graphical effects that achieve the same image fidelity as SVOGI with far better performance."
PC GPUs equivalent to the console ones perform the same, its up to the developer to support GPUs from different time periods. a 7900gt is a bit faster than the console GPUS and would proly still run games as good as the consoles if it were supported, but if you get a card equivalent the 7900gt, say an 8600gts or something newer, they will run games as well as the consoles if not better due to increased efficiency. Does it mean that the console GPUs are better than the 7900gt? nope, its just developer choice to support or not. This gen both consoles are using PC architecture to the point that I am betting that porting games would take almost no time at all between the 3 systems. Code written for the PS4 GPU would run native on my 7970, because they both use identical tech, where the 7970 is just going to render much faster. Its virtually the same on the CPU side. Your point about me upgrading a few years down the line is moot, especially since the 7970 is so much faster that console wont catch up the whole gen. Again lack of knowlege must suck huh? First of all games like crysis 3 are literally not runnable on a 7900gt, its DX11 only so that point is null, games like metro , battlefield are not playable either. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SA94jo2u_Q0 gets 20-43 fps on MW3 LOW . Ill informed hermits that think there rig is special make me laugh
Log in to comment