+1 = Life -1 = Death +1 = Life By the law of conservation of energy +1 = -1 0 = -2 or 2 = 0 Everyone is apart of the same system and this equation (at the upmost elementary) proves that energy cannot be either created or destroyed. If energy could be created or destroyed, then we would need some other sign in mathematics than an equal sign. We would need some other sign than an = sign because if energy cannot be created or destroyed, then all the energy present in the Universe right now must be equal to everything in the Universe that has ever been destroyed. If this were not the case then energy would not equal destruction.. Which is not what the law of conservation of energy implies.lo_Pine

but seriously, wat are you doing.

[QUOTE="zenogandia"]

What do you guys think of this facebook post? 

Witchtripper

I think 98% of these types of posts are fake. 

.

r/TumblrInAction

related

Both are sh*t

[QUOTE="JohnF111"]

You see, this is what billions in research and sophisticated equipment piloted by 50 years of endless work and education by the finest minds we have available can give us, evidence not fairy tales, not words of which no one knows who wrote, actual documented and repeatable evidence to support and substantiate a viewable and well accepted scientific theory of how the inner workings of an atom works. It's one of the reasons I love reading about things like this, theorized many years ago and-

Blood-Scribe

please stop

Wasn't this already in the news a few months ago?CongressManStan

[QUOTE="MannyDelgado"]

[QUOTE="Vickman178"]

 

I'm not even a hindu, or super "religious" in any way. I did go to a catholic school but that was because it was right down the street from my house. We had a class called World Religons where we look at all religions besides christianity and it peeked my interest and I continued studying on my own time and found hinduism/buddhism to be particulary interesting.

 

Hinduism is an incredibly old religion with a lot of history, and I honestly believe that the ancestors of this planet knew more then we give them credit for. There is a lot of stuff that can relate to science and if you had looked into (rather then making an ignorant comment like you did) i'm sure you would find it interesting.

Vickman178

If you disagree, perhaps you'd like to find me what parts of the Hindu scriptures discuss vacuum metastability events. I'll be waiting.

There are parts in the Hindu Vedas which in english translates to "Knowledge" and it speaks of an expanding universe. There is a lot of of stuff in the Vedas about cosmology, almost too much for me to explain all in once (not to mention I haven't read it all yet). Its not going to give you super detailed explanations like the false vacuum mestasbility theory of how particles are reacting when that happens but it still gives pretty good outlines of everything.

Keep in mind its over 6000 years old and the Vedas are not like traditional bible scriptures or the Quran. The muslims you speak of who may have took things Allah might have said in the Quran as proof is completely different from the Vedas. Parts of the Vedas read more like an ancient history/textbook then regular bible scripture or Quran scripture you may be used to. This is why I find it so interesting.

[QUOTE="themajormayor"]I don't understand why it's called that. I mean sure if it was the particle that instigated the BB or whatever. But this is just freaking gravityGIJames248

This. Hurray for the continued advance of theoretical physics, but I'm intrigued by the philosophical implications indicated by the name. Was this just the current holy grail of research in physics or is it supposed to explain away the need for first causes?