KZ2 is using the "Oh ****, its broke, lets fix it" method. Yea, its got the graphics, but in many of the previews its also been praised for its gameplay.

http://www.gamespot.com/ps3/action/killzone2/news.html?sid=6177525

http://ps3.ign.com/articles/815/815430p3.html

http://kotaku.com/gaming/notag/killzone-2-hands-on-293495.php

Yea, the Killzone franchise can never be a AAA one, but that doesn't mean that KZ2 can't be as good or even better then Halo 3.

So I ask you what makes Killzone more generic then Halo?

i was using cow logic. halo is 1 of the best consloe games ever. calling it generic is like saying mgs4 will suck.

because of the amazing power of the cell.

[QUOTE="MasterKillo"][QUOTE="AskForDetails"]

[QUOTE="MasterKillo"]killzone looks more generic than halo. Ezgam3r

no it really dosnt...lol not at all...

what makes you say that?

because halo uses the"if it aint broke dont fix it" method.it workeddam well. its a AAA franchise.killzone 2, from what ive seen uses the "wow them with graphics" method. look what happend to lair, which used that same method. halo is a AAA franchise, which killzone could NEVER be.

its become a trend for cows to go to every topic and say: "Wait for mgs4, FF13, GT5, Killzone 2 and R&C", i havent seen any game being mentioned as much as those^^^.....just like before when it was "wait for heavenly swordand Lair"mingo123

i know right. ive practically got those games memorized.

just wait...

[QUOTE="MasterKillo"]

gamespot is awfully glithcy today.

on topic, the same could be said of any game.

AskForDetails

yea it is glichty

and on topic...what where u refering to? coould be said about ne game?

any game that flops can have a sequal. that sequal could be potentially better or worse. killzone is one of them. i can see it getting an 8-8.5 .

btw, money is not everything. it will just make it a bigger flop if it flops.