Forum Posts Following Followers
20550 52 33

Master_Live Blog

I used to go a lot to the movie-theater, and now I don't.

I used to go to the movie theater A LOT. The experience you can get at the theater is unique from the one you can get watching a movie at home. But in today's day and age the experience has been greatly diminished by the need of people to get their mobile devices out and in turn irrevocably distract other people in the vicinity who are trying to enjoy the film.

In my peak I was going by myself to the movies every other week, sometimes even watching 3 different movies (each paid for separately of course) in 2 different theaters (by car) in 1 day. My grades suffered, but I didn't care as much, the "magic" of the movies had me in their grip and didn't let go. Two stretches per year took the bulk of the dates: from late August to early December and from late January to early May (I actually think of fall as the beginning of the movie "year").

For reasons (school, money and "other forms" becoming more readily available to watch) I started to see fewer and fewer movies at the theater. But probably the principal one was the fact that people were becoming more and more inconsiderate in how they behaved inside the movie-theater. Nothing, except probably people talking during a movie, ground my gears more than someone taking out their cellphone, full brightness on of course, during a movie to do WHATEVER. This included anything from ANSWERING CALLS in the middle of movie, even if it was just to say "I'm in the theater, can't talk now", to texting or having to send a tweet, to simply a phone ringing at the worst moment (which is ANY moment for those keeping score at home). Mind you, this was at least 5 years ago, who the hell knows what it is happening in 2019. As far as I'm concerned there is no excuse for this.

I won't apologize for this, if you were waiting for an important call that couldn't wait then maybe you shouldn't had been at the theater in the 1st place. I don't care that you feel the need to share will your friends your experience; face forward and shut the **** up. But I don't control other people and ushers are fucking useless and I shouldn't have to stand from my seat to ask an usher to take action or worst, having to do the policing myself.

I don't see this as an "old man yelling at the cloud" type of thing, just common courtesy. But with the near universal ubiquitousness of mobile devices this is not only to be (sadly) expected, but frankly, close to impossible to stop. Someone will always have a call that's too important to not answer, a forgetful mind that doesn't set their phones to silence, or some little brat that can't spent 2 hours of their lives without checking their phones and always always always IN.FULL.BRIGHTNESS.SETTING.

So I decided to quit, which is a damn shame because you can't replicate the movie-theater experience at home. The trailers advances (I always get to my seat before they start since I have to sit at center row, center column, of course, why you ask?), the air of anticipation, the crowd laughter at a joke that landed, a thundering applause after a perfectly executed sequence or the classic "I'm not crying, you are crying" at the end of a tearjerker. One of the most affecting experiences during those days was seeing this lady in his late 50's/early 60's trembling and sobbing after the end to Pan's Labyrinth. At first I scoffed at her (internally) but quickly, after glancing at her face and seeing her 3 friends seat by her side consoling her I actually got affected and instantly just wanted to go up to her and give her a hug and say: "what a great movie, right?".

But it wasn't meant to be. I eventually had to graduate, money was (is) tight and I got my 50 inch, 1080p, Panasonic Plasma. That and a laptop turnout it was all that I needed to have an intimate movie experience. Now I can pause a movie if I want to finish it later and can cry all I want without having to feel all embarrassed :P.

The last 3 years I have seen a combined total of 1 movie in theaters (Star Wars: The Last Jedi, opening day!). I did this because, aside from my high anticipation, I didn't want the movie to be spoiled to me which was a clear and present danger with a film of that nature. Now not even that will get me to the ticket line, this year regretfully Avengers: Endgame got spoiled to me: Iron Man dies at the end. It bothered me but that's the risk you run in da' internet if you don't see a popular movie right away and wait for it to hit Blu-ray. I accepted that, the only Marvel Universe film I have seen in theaters is...Iron Man 1 so it wasn't like it was A HUGE DEAL but it irritated me enough to acknowledge my current system isn't perfect.

And having decided not to see Star Wars: Rise of Skywalker in theaters (a one man strike!) I know it will probably go the same way. But that series isn't worthy of my money (whole other blog could be written about that) plus nowadays I expect people with full blown iPads in their side seats so like Michael says, "that's the past Connie".

My suggestion would be for theaters to designate "no electronics" specific rooms in which people would leave their cellphones, iWatches etcetera in a designated space so everyone can enjoy the showing in peace. If privacy and security concerns arise then I wouldn't object to an honor system in which everyone agrees to the rules beforehand (0 tolerance policy) in which offenders are never allowed in those rooms again. But I don't own any theaters and I'm not aware if said idea would be in enough demand to be implemented. But I doubt it, people want their phones and I haven't heard much about the subject in any mainstream publications (or any publications for that matter).

So now I'm just head deep in my eccentricities, I have become so accustomed to watching movies by myself that it's now inextricably entwined in my nature. The good times where much more numerous than the bitter ones even if the bitter-to-sweet ratio was heading to wrong way at the end. So I wish to remember the fond memories and accept this different approach that I have adopted as a necessary evolution. And that's that.

A look back at the year 2014 in film.

I think I will do this "look backs" from time to time, only rule is that at least 5 years have transpired.

Best Films, TV Series seasons, Documentaries of 2014 (maximum of 5):

  • Ex Machina
  • Foxcatcher
  • Ida
  • Interstellar
  • True Detective

***Comments: Still remember being in awed at the Ex Machina's special effects, at the it seems this kind of a low budget film which made the quality of the special effects even more impressive. Foxcatcher is an eerie and depressing movie (right in my wheel house!) with good performances by Mark Ruffalo, Channing Tatum and Steve Carell. Carell's performance particularly stands out and, as it turns out, gives the impression that he has a much larger range than he actually does (Beautiful Boy, Vice, Welcome to Marwen). Ida is a black and white Polish film directed by Pawel Pawlikowski about a young woman on the verge of taking vows as a Catholic nun and discovers a family secret. The movie was released in 2013 but was considered for the Oscar with all the others 2014 nominees so I'm going to consider it here. Interstellar is the star of the group, backed by a hunting score by Hans Zimmer, it is the only film of the group that I have seen more once and 2nd item to have that distinction (True Detective). True Detective Season 1 was a TV phenomenon, which lived up to the billing even if plagued by a rushed ending.

Now lets hand out some awards Oscars style:

Best Film (aka film that I liked most):

  • Ex Machina
  • Foxcatcher
  • Ida
  • Interstellar (Winner)

Best Achievement in Directing:

  • Alex Garland: Ex Machina
  • Bennett Miller: Foxcatcher
  • Christopher Nolan: Interstellar (Winner)
  • Pawel Pawlikowski: Ida

Best Performance by an Actor in a Leading Role (aka which performance I liked the most):

  • Bradley Cooper: American Sniper
  • Steve Carell: Foxcatcher (Winner)
  • Andrew Garfield: 99 Homes
  • Jake Gyllenhaal: Nightcrawler
  • Chris Pratt: Guardians of the Galaxy

***Comments: Seems like a contradiction to give the award Carell but then say that the performance gave the impression that he have a larger range than he actually has given his subpar performances in Beautiful Boy, Vice, Welcome to Marwen. I'm as mistified as anyone, Carell seems to give good performances in what I like to call "serious comedies" or artsy fancy comedies like Little Miss Sunshine and (to a lesser degree) Dan in Real Life but this Foxcatcher performance seems to be a one of caliber he hasn't been able to replicate so far.

Best Performance by an Actress in a Leading Role (aka you get the idea):

  • Emily Blunt: Edge of Tomorrow
  • Rosamund Pike: Gone Girl
  • Agata Trzebuchowska: Ida (Winner)
  • Reese Witherspoon: Wild

Best Performance by an Actor in a Supporting Role:

  • Robert Duvall: The Judge
  • J.K. Simmons: Whiplash (Winner)
  • Mark Ruffalo: Foxcatcher

Best Performance by an Actress in a Supporting Role:

  • Patricia Arquette: Boyhood
  • Anne Hathaway: Interstellar (Winner)
  • Agata Kulesza: Ida
  • Alicia Vikander: Ex Machina

***Comments: I just love Anne Hathaway, she is one of the most talented and beautiful actress in the world. She should win all the awards.

Best Writing, Original Screenplay:

  • Ex Machina: Alex Garland
  • Dan Gilroy: Nightcrawler
  • E. Max Frye, Dan Futterman: Foxcatcher
  • Jonathan Nolan & Christopher Nolan: Interstellar (Winner)
  • Pawel Pawlikowski, Rebecca Lenkiewicz: Ida

Best Writing, Adapted Screenplay:

  • Damien Chazelle: Whiplash (Winner)
  • James Gunn, Nicole Perlman: Guardians of the Galaxy
  • Jason Hall: American Sniper
  • Christopher McQuarrie, Jez Butterworth and John-Henry Butterworth: Edge of Tomorrow

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Finally, my ratings for all the movies, documentaries and TV series of 2014 that I have seen (as of May 28, 2019):

7's

  • A Most Violent Year
  • American Sniper
  • Boyhood
  • Citizenfour
  • Deux jours, une nuit
  • Edge of Tomorrow
  • Ex Machina
  • Foxcatcher
  • Gone Girl
  • Guardians of the Galaxy
  • Ida* (2013)
  • Interstellar
  • Nightcrawler
  • Pawn Sacrifice
  • Pride
  • Red Army (Documentary)
  • The Fault in Our Stars
  • The Internet's Own Boy: The Story of Aaron Swartz (Documentary)
  • The Theory of Everything
  • True Detective (Series)
  • Whiplash
  • Wild

6's

  • 99 Homes
  • A Most Wanted Man
  • Batman: Assault on Arkham (Direct to video)
  • Birdman or (The Unexpected Virtue of Ignorance)
  • Dawn of the Planet of the Apes
  • Godzilla
  • Hungry Hearts
  • Inherent Vice
  • Leviafan
  • Life Itself (Documentary)
  • Mr. Turner
  • Neighbors
  • Relatos Salvajes
  • St. Vincent
  • Still Alice
  • The Grand Budapest Hotel
  • The Hunger Games: Mockingjay - Part 1
  • The Imitation Game
  • The Judge
  • The Lego Movie
  • The Rover
  • Unbroken
  • X-Men: Days of Future Past

5's

  • Autómata
  • Big Eyes
  • Fargo (Series)
  • God's Pocket
  • Good Kill
  • Jersey Boys
  • John Wick
  • Justice League: War (Direct to video)
  • Kill the Messenger
  • Kingsman: The Secret Service
  • Selma
  • Serbuan Maut 2: Berandal
  • The Drop
  • The Homesman

4's

  • Captain America: The Winter Soldier
  • Cold in July
  • Frank
  • Fury
  • The Sublime and Beautiful
  • The Toy Soldiers

3's

  • The Gambler
  • The Interview

***Comments: 67 items in total.

Los Simpsons: 10/10.

The Simpsons are the most influential work of film/TV series in terms of shaping my outlook of life while growing up, only rivaled by the Bugs Bunny/Merry Melodies & Tom & Jerry cartoons, and perhaps the amalgamation of Hanna-Barbera cartoons (basically, anything the Cartoon Network put in front of me).

For at least the last 2 years I have been re-watching the whole series before handing out my judgment.

But this is kind of sad and perhaps a fortunate story too. See, I come from a home in which Spanish was the only language spoken. While growing up I had the great fortune of going to a private school (from kindergarten to the 6th grade) in which English was thought as a 2nd language. At home, when watching cartoons, I would inevitably gravitate toward The Cartoon Network (never Disney or Nickelodeon) which would have some of their programming in Spanish and other in English. The Flintstones? Spanish. The Jetsons? Spanish. Scooby Doo? Both, but mainly Spanish. Bugs Bunny? Both. You get the idea, some in Spanish, some in English, sometimes 1 or the other.

With the Simpsons it was a different story. As you may know The Simpsons have never been part of or shown on The Cartoon Network. Locally they were shown on Channel 11 (much later acquired by Univision) and always in Spanish. So they grew up with me (we are somewhere around the same age) and I with them, the always dutiful and hardworking Marge (modeled after my mom, of course), that devilish Bart (I saw something of him in me), the bookwormy and sensitive Lisa, the dumb but well meaning Homer, Maggie and the rest of the lot. Needless to say that I saw and learned about the everyday vicissitudes that they endured and try to apply them to my own unique context and circumstances.

While I outgrew other of the old cartoons (Scooby and the gang can only catch the bad guy so many times before it gets old) the Simpsons remained a fixture in my life. Then around 2005/2006 something horrible occurred (Season 16). Due to a dispute between the voice actor’s union and the company in charge of the Spanish dubbing many of the original voice actors quit and were replace by new, lesser talent. This affected the voices of Homer, Marge, Lisa and several of the supporting characters. I remember to this day the first time I heard the new Homer voice; I was stunned and didn’t understood what was happening. At first, I thought it was some sort of temporary mistake since in previous seasons some minor characters were voiced by different actors if their screen time on a particular episode was limited (they wouldn’t pay the regular actor their regular fee for 1 line I suppose). I stuck with it at first, decide I would make the best out of a bad situation, I tried to focus on the characters which voices remained the same, like Bart, but I couldn’t. Eventually I realized they weren’t coming back, and I decided it wasn’t worth the effort.

So, you know when people complain about the current quality of the series and how they aren’t as good as “the earlier seasons”? well, I didn’t get to experience that, at least not fully. It is certainly true that there is a quality drop in say, Seasons 14-15 to the earlier seasons and differences in animation can be staggering when looked at closely. But even in Seasons 14 and 15, of which I will say surprisingly I had not seen at least 80% of the episodes in Season 15, there still are some good quality episodes while never being bad. I would characterize the worst episodes in Season 14 and 15as merely existing, not bad or good but just “there”. Some in an ironic way, the change of the voices prevented me from fully experiencing whatever ostensibly dramatic drop in quality and whatever once in while great episode the series delivered from Seasons 17 onward. So, when I rate the Simpsons 10/10, know that I do so rating only Seasons 1 to 15.

In way, for me, the Simpsons remain frozen in time for ever beautiful (just like Maggie is forever a baby). They aged gracefully because in a way they never did.

What I'm going to write about next.

Sooner:

  • The Simpsons
  • A discussion on the current experience of what it is like to go to the movies in this day and age.
  • My favorite movie of 2017 (I did 2014 instead).
  • My ordeal in trying to switch out of iTunes and into Mediamonkey and Musicbee.

Later:

  • Which type/genre of movies I prefer.
  • The Lineal Champion, the Contemporary Champion.
  • The influence of guns in my movie preferences.

What do my ratings mean?

7 out 10. That’s the key. That’s the difference between life and death.

7 out of 10 means that I like a film, TV series, etc. enough to want to see it again.

7 out of 10 also means that I think said film or TV series is good.

If I rate something 7 out of 10 it means I keep it, literally. If I rate it 6 or lower, I erase from my computer so getting to 7 is the difference between staying with me or being 1 and done.

So, in effect, the most important ratings are 7 and 6. 7, 8, 9 and 10 just denote how much I liked said film or series. 6, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1 on the other side describe how much I disliked it.

Now, this is a gradient, rating something 6 isn’t the same as rating something a 1 or a 2. 6 probably means “worth watching”. There is no equivocation with 5, 5 means bad.

On the other hand, 8 means great, 9 means superb and 10 means excellent. That about sums it up.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Did I like this film? Yes or no?

That’s the question I’m trying to answer when I’m rating a movie.

And that’s was basically what Roger Ebert (with his partner Gene Siskel) was doing when he distilled all this reviewing business with a simple “thumbs up/thumbs down”.

As I have commented before Ebert was a big influence on me early on when I got into movies. Another influence on me was the website Internet Movie Data Base (IMDB), specifically, their Top 1000’s ratings.

7 I like it, 6 I didn’t like it (but it might be worth watching). There, that’s what it comes down to. That’s my version of thumb up or thumb down. But why 7 and 6? Why not 6 and 5 or 8 and 7? Good question, this is where IMDB influence shows up.

I created my IMDB on July 2006, from the beginning I noticed that it was a wonderful site which summarized relevant information (director, writers, actors etc.) on each movie, with what it seems an infinite catalog, forums for each movie (now defunct) and of course, I could rate my movies. I realized the most important useful use of this wasn’t rating any individual film but the fact that rating films allowed me to keep track of which movies I had seen and when I had seen them. After browsing and familiarizing with the ratings and the community one starts to peg what each rating meant: 7’s were good, 8’s were rare and only 2 movies, if I recalled correctly, were rated 9 or above (The Shawshank Redemption and The Godfather: Part I). 6’s were bad.

Then there was the Top 1000’s voters on IMDB. According to IMDB the Top 1000’s voters consist of: “the 1,000 people who have voted for the most titles in our ratings poll”. 99% of the time these voters’ ratings are lower than the overall rating you see on each film page, and in many instances significantly lower. These ratings are closer to my ratings.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Hopefully this has clarified what my ratings mean and informs you about my train of thought when evaluating a film or a series.

2019 Master at the Movies' Power Ranking.

These are the 2019 Power Ranking:

  1. The Irishman
  2. Once Upon A Time In Hollywood...
  3. Deadwood
  4. Toy Story 4
  5. Star Wars: Episode IX
    • The Irishman: 2nd time Martin Scorsese has been at the top of Rankings (Silence 2016), only director to have done it so far. I'm started to get antsy about this one, the film is supposedly using a digital de-aging technique and we haven't heard or seen anything about it. No information means I start thinking it might be going bad and they don't know what to do about it. This is just speculation on my part, I trust Scorsese, he is probably my favorite director of all time and this might be his last "gangster film" so I want him to go out with a bang (pun intended).
    • Once Upon A Time In Hollywood: I had some doubts about whether this film would make the list but the trailer solidified it for me. Looks like fun and the trailer didn't showed any of the violence that you know will be part of the film since: 1) it is Tarantino 2) subject matter being, in part, the Charles Manson murders.
    • Deadwood: This is a sequel to the hit HBO TV series being done for TV. After being abruptly cancelled in 2006, there has been on and off talks about a TV movie or something and it finally came together in 2018. Just like re-visiting old friends.
    • Toy Story 4: The Original and still the best Pixar franchise is back. First 3 film have range from good to superb and I expect the 4th installment to continue that proud tradition.
    • Star Wars: Episode IX: Well, lets keep it short. I didn't particularly liked Force Awakens and I actively disliked Last Jedi. So why keep coming back to it? Don't know, I guess I'm a sucker. I think Disney needs to take a time out with the movies and get a new producer to oversee the whole franchise (good luck with that now that Kennedy has re-signed her deal). I think the single and most important way I can demonstrate my displeasure with the direction of the franchise is to not see the movie at the theater. After all, it is all about the money, isn't it?

Honorable Mention:

Some observations:

In each year only 1 out of my top 5 most anticipated movies have been rated 7 or better (none have scored better than 7). And none of the highest rated movies was ranked above 4th in the Power Rankings: (5th in 2015, 4th in 2016, 2017 & 2018).

In 4 of the 5 years of the Rankings a Star Wars Universe movie has been included into the Power Rankings (Star Wars: The Force Awakens, Rogue One, Star Wars: The Last Jedi & Star Wars: Episode IX). In 2018 Solo: A Star Wars Story failed to make the list.

  • Power Ranking movies I have seen at the theater:
    • 2015: Star Wars: The Force Awakens, Spectre and Sicario.
    • 2016: The Accountant and Rogue One.
    • 2017: Star Wars: The Last Jedi.
    • 2018: None.
    • 2019: Maybe Episode IX but I doubt it. The Last Jedi was mediocre and I don't feel like contributing to Disney's coffers.

My Rules When Watching A Movie or TV Show.

  • I can't change the rating of movie or TV show I have rated without rewatching said movie or show again.
    • This rules aren't numbered but this is the most important rule of them all. It is simple, I watch a movie, lets say Hostiles, I rated a 7; if wanted to change the rating the only way to accomplish this is by rewatching the movie again. Why? Well, why would I would I want to change the rating of film in the first place? If I'm changing the rating then that means I think the movie is either better or worst than the rating I gave it to it, but how am I certain of that? Maybe I'm misremembering. The only way to be absolutely certain is to rewatch it, there is no escaping that fact. This also prevents from the chaos it would ensue if I could nonchalantly change the ratings, which is also why it is so important to get the correct rating in the first place.
  • I will not be sleepy when watching a film or TV show.
    • You can only watch a film for the first time once in your life, this obvious and crucial. I have to be my best condition and state of mind when watching a movie. If I feel fine when starting a film but become sleepy in the middle of it, pause it and finish it at a later time. These works deserve our respect.
  • Be fair.
    • Simple, no? When rating a film consider how it stand on its own and how it compares to other works rated similarly. Does it stack up? Be mindful and not petty.
  • Be by myself.
    • I tend to get emotional often when watching films, sometimes I cry, a lot. The truth is if I'm watching a film with someone beside I will inhibit my emotions, that's just the way I am so I solve this by watching stuff alone. It is what it is.
  • Watch films/TV Shows in its original language.
    • It can be pain in the ass to read subtitles but the way something is said in its original language sometimes can't be fully transmitted without losing something in translation.
  • A flaw is a flaw if I notice it when I’m watching it.
    • OK, lets say I watch X film and thought it was good. Then, after rating it, 2 days later I start thinking about said film and I realize that a part of the plot didn't actually made sense because Y or Z, well that's not that important because when I was actually watching the film I didn't notice it and it didn't lessen my enjoyment of the film. That doesn't mean I can't take said inconsistency into account when re-rating a film if it is a big enough of plot hole or whatever. Basically, if it worked then it worked, there's no need to deconstruct it.
    • Yet this actually apply less and less the more I watch a film. If I watch a film a lot then by definition I must like it (since why would repeatedly watch stuff I didn't enjoyed?) and most likely I would tend to highly rate said work (a 9 or a 10). When I highly rate a film/TV Show then I do think a have a responsibility to take into account any said flaw/inconsistency/plot hole etc. since such a high rating would imply a level of rewatch-ability that would take this flaw/inconsistency/plot hole etc. into account. It is only human nature that once you see a work enough times that start to deconstruct it and see how all parts fit in.

The Academy Can't Stop Chasing The Ghost of The Dark Knight.

The Dark Knight was released in 2008 to critical acclaim and box office success.

The Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences (The Academy) nominated Heath Ledger for Best Supporting Actor for his diabolical and exquisite portrayal of The Joker. The film was bestowed with a total of 8 Oscars nominations, winning 2 including a posthumous statuette for Ledger.

To my surprise, and that of many, it wasn't nominated for Best Picture.

This seems to have broken The Academy.

In 2009 The Academy expanded the Best Picture category from 5 nominees to 10 nominees (2 years later it revised the rule to at least 5 nominees with a maximum of 10). This is sometimes called The Dark Knight rule (or Wall.E rule).

When TDK wasn't nominated (or Christopher Nolan nominated for Best Director) I was mad, but I let it go. When I saw the rule change I felt it was misguided, I didn't want a rule change that would cheapen the Best Picture category, all I wanted to know is why it wasn't nominated in the first place and FIX THAT.

Maybe there was nothing to fix. The Academy did recognized it in 8 categories but for whatever reason it didn't deemed TDK worthy of a Best Picture nomination. It is what it is, people have opinions. I let it go.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

In recent years The Academy has made changes to their membership composition to reflect a more diverse, active and younger segment of the film industry. This has included a new members that as a % increases the number of females, minorities, international filmmakers while being more extrict about purging inactive members from their list. I felt that if the high standard for membership was maintained but applied to a wither range of individuals this could be nothing but beneficial to The Academy as a whole and yes, in some way, by expanding the background and experiences of the individuals that composed The Academy then as a side effect it would lead to a membership more conducing to the probability of nominating a The Dark Knight-like movie for Best Picture in the future.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Today The Academy has announced that it will add a "Popular Film Category" called "Outstanding Achievement in Popular Film".

This reeks of desperation. And it seems it is in response, or fear, to the possibility that Black Panther might not be nominated for Best Picture.

I haven't seen Black Panther, maybe it deserves to be nominated for Best Picture, maybe it doesn't.

But here we are, yes, 10 years later after the release of The Dark Knight and The Academy is desperate enough for viewers (last year it was the least watched ceremony to date) that they have created a whole new category just to pander to the masses.

The Best Picture category has been expended to at least 10 spots, if Black Panther doesn't get nominated then maybe it doesn't deserve it. 10 years later we have an expanded category and a more diverse membership and The Academy is so scare of the possible backlash/continued loss of viewership that they have lessen themselves like a whore.

When I first saw the headline I thought it was a joke, then I thought that this was most assuredly an idea that was being discussed to maybe be implemented in the future, but nop, it is actually happening.

I dislike when people talk and talk about how things are bad but never take meaningful action to better themselves or the situation they think ought to change/improve. Aside from limiting the ceremony to 3 hours changes to be implemented by The Academy include the fact that "select categories will be presented during commercial breaks. Winning moments will be edited and later aired during the broadcast." according to Variety.com Fewer people are watching the Oscars every year (with some exceptions). Isn't that just a general trend? People are cord cutting. Plus the country is politically polarized so a huge chunk of the population is automatically turn-off by a ceremony that is too preachy. Sometimes no change is better than any change.

Here is the perfect test for The Academy to learn whether or not the changes they have made to the composition of their membership and the number of Best Picture spots produce the results they are looking for. They don't have faith in themselves or the process they have set up.

10 years later The Academy is still chasing the one that got away, they can't let it go.

1st Film I Remember Watching At The Movies Was Titanic...

  • The first time I remember, consciously, going to the movies was to see the movie Titanic (theatrical run of 10 months between 1997-1998) with my mother. I remember there being a long line to get in. I also, for some reason, new beforehand that there was a scene where Kate Winslet was nude and I fully expected my mom to raise her hand in front on my eyes to block the view. At the beginning of the scene I kept looking with the corner of my eye to track her movements but the block never arrived. I wasn't even 10 years old I believe.
  • I guess that whole evening stuck with me because it out of the ordinary since while growing up my parents never took me to the movies. I think that's because neither of them spoke or could truly understand English and they preferred to simply catch them in Spanish whenever the local channels got the rights to it.
  • In 1998 I was at the mall with my mother and she was bored out of her mind and she said for me to pick a movie to watch. I picked The Waterboy. Yikes.
  • In 1999 came the first time I remember my father taking me, my mother and brother to the theater. The Phantom Menace. Darth Maul sure made an impression on me, and it was clear that this Star Wars thing was synonymous with "an event".
  • Before I could or would decide to go to movies by myself I only went to the theater during the summer in summer camp. From 1999 to 2002 we went to a relatively small and isolated cinema complex and saw Wild Wild West, The Flintstones in Viva Rock Vegas and Star Wars: Attack of the Clones (not that bad by comparison) among others.
  • By 2004, unbeknownst to me, I was being indoctrinated by my high school teachers which homework assignments included Fahrenheit 9/11 and The Motorcycle Diaries (a biopic about the journey and written memoir of a 23-year-old Ernesto "Che" Guevara).
  • 2005 looks like the definitive year in which I started to take agency about which films I decided to see at theater. Among them Batman Begins (twice), Star Wars: Revenge of the Sith and the first time me and my friends decided to dare buy tickets for an R movie (our oldest looking member bought them): Saw II.
  • Then in 2006, for reasons we shall not discuss, what we may call a Movie Cambrian Explosion occurred. Let’s take a look at the graph:
Graph includes multiple viewings, for example, in 2008 I saw The Dark Knight 3 times in the theater so that would count for 3 separate viewings.
Graph includes multiple viewings, for example, in 2008 I saw The Dark Knight 3 times in the theater so that would count for 3 separate viewings.

  • In the peak year of 2009, according to my records, I saw 26 films in the theater that out of the total 37 theatrical releases I have rated for the year 2009. That's 70% of all the films that I saw in 2009. That % is certainly higher since I have seen 37 films from the year 2009 but not all of them in 2009 but I digress. Point being that I loved going to the movies.
  • That number started to fell precipitously when, among other reasons, different high quality methods to watch films became an option.
  • By the beginning of the 2010's I started questioning why I was putting myself through the ordeal of watching movies in the theater where inconsiderately individuals were making my experience miserable when I could enjoy them from the comfort of my home.
  • December 22nd 2016 I saw 3 movies (Nocturnal Animals, Jackie and Rogue One) in 2 theaters, I consider this to be my last official day as a "regular" movie goer.
  • 2017: Star Wars: The Last Jedi is the last film I have seen in the theater.
  • 2018: have not seen a single film in the theater so far and I predict that shall continue for the foreseeable future.

A look back at "Master at the Movies' Power Ranking".

For those who may not know the title makes reference to the Siskel & Ebert & the Movies television show. The show consisted of two film critics from opposing newspapers (Gene Siskel and Roger Ebert) in which they viewed clips from the week's new movies, discussed them, then passed judgment expressed in thumbs up (to approve) or thumbs down (not worth seeing). Roger Ebert was a big influence in my formative years when I began watching movies and I will talk about him later on when I discuss my philosophy when rating movies.

These were the Power Rankings for previous years with their respecting ratings:

2015

  1. Star Wars: The Force Awakens: 6/10
  2. Spectre: 6/10
  3. The Revenant: 6/10
  4. Triple 9: 6/10
  5. Sicario: 7/10

2016

  1. Silence: 6/10
  2. The Accountant: 6/10
  3. A Monster Calls: 6/10
  4. Rogue One: 7/10
  5. Live By Night: 5/10

2017

  1. Twin Peaks: 6/10
  2. Star Wars: The Last Jedi: 5/10
  3. Phantom Thread: 6/10
  4. Dunkirk: 7/10
  5. Wind River: 6/10

Quite interesting, some observations:

  • In each year only 1 out of my top 5 most anticipated movies have been rated 7 or better (7 to be exact). And none of the highest rated movies was ranked above 4th in the Power Rankings: (5th in 2015, 4th in 2016 and 2017).
  • On each of the 1st 3 years a Star Wars Universe movie was included into the Power Rankings (Star Wars: The Force Awakens, Rogue One, Star Wars: The Last Jedi) a streak that was broken this year with the exclusion of Solo: A Star Wars Story but will probably resume next year with Star Wars: Episode IX.
  • Silly fact: A film in which an Affleck brother has acted or directed has been included in 3 of the 4 years of the Power Rankings: (2015: Casey in Triple 9, 2016: Ben in both The Accountant and Live By Night which he also directed, 2018: Casey in The Old Man & The Gun).
  • Seen in the theater:
    • 2015: Star Wars: The Force Awakens, Spectre and Sicario.
    • 2016: The Accountant and Rogue One.
    • 2017: Star Wars: The Last Jedi.
    • 2018: Probably none.
  • 24 results
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3