No, RDR is a fun game but incredibly overrated. I can guarantee you, if their was ever a good western game before RDR, RDR would have gotten worse scores from critics.
All you have to do is go slow and know that every single obstacle you come across has an easy way to kill so if what you're using isn't working another method will work.
If you try to rush through it you'll die a lot, if you take your time you'll finish the game easily
Jaysonguy
Actually, rushing would have made this game "stupidly simple", you have to remember how enemies move and study them.
So, this game is not "stupidly simple" like you claim. If you want to play something stupidly simple, go try some Dead Rising 1 & 2 and be amazed. DS is simple, but to say it takes barely any thought process to play it is just... incredibly stupid?
It is hard, until you get the hang of it that is. Hell, even once you get the hang of it, you'll eventually have a hard time sooner or later. But to the TC, DS or any other game is only "to hard to be fun" if you hate a challenge.
No :P, I would rather save my money for the much better games like, L.A Norie, Mass Effect 2 (maybe 3, if it comes out next year), The Elder Scrolls 5, Duke Nukem Forever, and Dragon Age 2.
I saw my neighbor fall off his roof, landed on his head.
What happen was, his kids were playing and they kicked some ball onto their house. Then the dad tried getting the ball off the roof by climbing through a window. I saw him fall and immediately called 911, sadly he smashed his head up, and it caved in. I mainly feel bad for the kids though, the guilt must be terrible. (this happened about 3 years ago)
Bethesda did not develop F:New Vegas, however they did make Obsidian rush out the game, so I blame them for all the bugs. When it comes to Bethesda developing their own games, Im sure they do a much better job. I doubt their will be many bugs in the next Elder Scrolls, but if their are im sure Bethy will jump on them quickly after release, like they did with Fallout 3.
Log in to comment