It would make a crap video game, can't think of a good tv series vidja game adaptation myself.

Maybe MethLab Tycoon?

Ilovegames1992

It would make a crap video game? If it were open world it could be similar to GTA but easily better due to better characters and better writing. If it were an adventure by Telltale it would have the same type of tension that is exhibited in the Walking Dead game, with better characters and if the show's writers were on board, better writing as well.

None.  

Making this into a game would just scream cash grab, and would cheapen the writing to what is arguably one of the best shows out there, bar none.  

Hallenbeck77

It would be cash grab just like Telltale's Walking Dead game...

you might be the only one.

CaseyWegner

I keep thinking over and over that Breaking Bad would make a great video game. I could see it being an open-world videogame like GTA with Walt and Jesse as playable characters or they could even go the Walking Dead route and have Telltale make this very story-driven adventure game, or just some linear-based action game. 

I really don't see why the show ended so soon. A game would be a great way to make the show live on for much longer. What kind of game would you want Breaking Bad to be?

games prices are worth based soley on their rarity, not the kind of disc being used.  just google rare ps3 or 360 games, some of them are rediculously expensive.

kingoflife9

no, why would you do that

wiiutroll

:lol:

So in the used games market where game prices are decided by rarity of titles the ps3 version of games will be worth more because they "last forever" therefor all copies of those games will still be around and on the market as compared to 360 versions which supposedly are prone to "scratching" therefor the games will be much rarer and thus worth less?

:lol:

 

WilliamRLBaker

Over time it will get worse and worse for 360 games condition. You're telling me you go on ebay and spend the same amount of money on NES, SNES, PS1, Saturn, N64, etc. acceptable, good, very good games as you do on like new games? I don't see any reason to laugh. What's laughable is spending the same amount of $ on a worse condition item.

Just like the games that sold less on consoles in previous generations, we all know PS3 games will be worth more than 360 games due to there being less copies and Bluray holding up much better to disc damage than DVD. Do you buy PS3 games instead of 360 games because of this?

CA just signed law that allows transgender students to use any bathroom. Do you support this or do you believe places should provide a 3rd bathroom? 

Site erased 90% of my post. Forget it. I'm done talking here. People arguing over complete BS and missing the big picture. It is not limited to Samsung TV's. It's Samsung TV's, or AT&T, or DirecTV, or Comcast. It doesn't matter who did voice or gesture control first for SOME OTHER REASON on their device. It doesn't matter MS did it first to control your 360. That is irrelevant to the fact that other companies are doing it for TV and doing it before Xbox 1 even launches. It's not a discussion of who had the technology first. It's a discussion of who is bringing it to consumers for television first. But it's all very clear you're just trying to piss me off for no reason other than to be trolls. Forget it.

[QUOTE="Meta-Gnostic"][QUOTE="clyde46"] No shit you can control the 360 with Kinect. NOT TALKING ABOUT THAT. TALKING ABOUT CONTROLLING TV WITH VOICE/GESTURES. Don't live in Europe. We are talking about the American Market.[QUOTE="psymon100"]

[QUOTE="Meta-Gnostic"]

[QUOTE="psymon100"]

Depends on what you mean by 'behind'. 

Are they behind Xbox 360 with Kinect?

Is Kinect behind all the super old voice activated stuff? Like check this out:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=chN6y1Fu7kM#t=5s

razgriz_101

Then, what about Xbox 360 and Kinect 1?

[QUOTE="psymon100"]

[QUOTE="Desmonic"] Why would use that as an example when he clearly means TV's (at least in Samsung's case) that have released in the past 2-3 years? Sure TC is just seeking attention and making an incredibly useless argument, but that was an odd answer my friend! :P

Desmonic

I don't think it should seem that odd compared to the TC's OP. 

He compares a smart TV, to Xbox One's Kinect. Saying that these smart TV's have come to the party with the technology - faster. 

So, straight away we can compare the existing Kinect to the smart TV, to point out - as you say so yourself - the superficial nature of their argument. Kinect 1 came to the party faster than these smart TVs. 

My inclusion of the voice activation computer is to show that voice activation has been around for such a long time, it's kind of dumb to point out someone being 'first' this late.