MicrosoftVP_Ted's forum posts

Avatar image for MicrosoftVP_Ted
MicrosoftVP_Ted

82

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 MicrosoftVP_Ted
Member since 2013 • 82 Posts

I love both, but I'd go for the Genesis, ironic part, I'm not that big of a fan of Sonic.

For example I think Sonic 1 is really good and Sonic 3+Knuckles is awesome, but Super Mario World is much better, but I still prefer the Genesis.

To me, Shadowrun on the Genesis is the best 16 bit game ever made, so ahead of it's time that to this day it does things that even current generation WRPGs don't my 2nd favourite 16 bit game is super metroid. From that point on it becomes a close battle between the Genesis and the SNES with the Genesis winning a minor lead.

For example: (Blue Favours Sega, red Favours Nintendo)

I prefer Castlevania Bloodlines over Super Castlevania 4 (TBH I find Super Castlevania 4 a pretty boring game)I prefer Contra hardcorps over Contra 3I think Final Fantasy 6 is the best JRPG of it's time with Chrono Trigger, Phantasy Star 4 and Shining Force 2 fighting for 2nd placeI think Streets of Rage 2 is the best beat' em up of it's timeKiller Instinct is a better fighting game then any exclusive Genesis fighter imo I much prefer the Genesis fast paced SHMUPS over the SNES ones (though I do love UN Squadron)I think Actraiser is the best Action Adventure game on the 16 bit console

 umm.. what else...

Oh, I know it's a guilty pleasure, but I love D&D: Warriors of the Eternal SunI also don't really count games like Dune 2, Wolfenstein 3D, Doom or Sim City or Might and Magic because I'd much rather play them on the PCrilpas
I disagree with fighters, with better in cases and faster versions of games like SF and Mortal Kombat most importantly, you have these exclusive fighters:    I would also have to politely decline Action-Adventures with these classics:
Avatar image for MicrosoftVP_Ted
MicrosoftVP_Ted

82

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 MicrosoftVP_Ted
Member since 2013 • 82 Posts

[QUOTE="MicrosoftVP_Ted"]I like to envision the Xbox as the only quality entertainment interactive on the market the 6th generation of gaming consoles, and it is so. While not to far off from the PS2 library, would you agree that exclusives and shared with others, that the Xbox simply had more quality assured than the PS2? You can talk about quantity, however, tons of games in genres that the PS2 is not strong act are sub-par compared to the engaging experience on the Xbox other than japanese developed Action-Adventure and Role-playing titles, which at the time were all very similar and are not actually relevant.CaptainGamespot

f*** no, I would never do that. I bought an xbox, loved it, supported it, bought xbox live, bought every AAA title, even some AA titles. 

Can't top the ps2 library though, can't even touch it. Sony had soo many exclusive 1st party games and 3rd party games to ignore.

ps2 had too much high ranking quality games and obviously quantity of games. ps2 was a beast. 

it's not a quality vs. quanity equation, as ps2 had both titles.

I would disagree with a large first-party, that didn't really happen until this gen. Also, the thread title is a bit misleading I meant if you think the Xbox had quality would you put it over the PS2, there was just not enough space. Here is random comparison using Gamespot Comparison: PS2:775 A, AA, and AAA+ games. More than that under 5.0 Xbox:462 A, AA, and AAA+ games. Less than that under 5.0 Gamecube:256 A, AA, and AAA+ games. More than that under 5.0 Dreamcast::135 A, AA, and AAA+ games. More than that under 5.0
Avatar image for MicrosoftVP_Ted
MicrosoftVP_Ted

82

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 MicrosoftVP_Ted
Member since 2013 • 82 Posts
The SNES is not in my eye, worth it, and gamespot posted my previous for me automaticaly before I finished. Back to the point, it had very few games that were worth it to me, and every single system in competition for it during the gen, every single one had me more interested. The SNES is not bad, just nothing there outside a few gems. Ok, I guess the CD-I doesn't beat the SNES, but all other competition.
Avatar image for MicrosoftVP_Ted
MicrosoftVP_Ted

82

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 MicrosoftVP_Ted
Member since 2013 • 82 Posts

Nintendos first party games destory what sega had.

osirisx3
Like what? We need more lists in the thread. :) Anyway, the SNES is not in my
Avatar image for MicrosoftVP_Ted
MicrosoftVP_Ted

82

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 MicrosoftVP_Ted
Member since 2013 • 82 Posts
[QUOTE="MicrosoftVP_Ted"][QUOTE="Tessellation"]

or

:twisted: :cool:

Tessellation
Ot a smaller more powerful HD3000

lol i can only emulate gamecube games at 60fps with that card,i have that on my mac :lol:

Which uses it differently than a windows lap or desktop.
Avatar image for MicrosoftVP_Ted
MicrosoftVP_Ted

82

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 MicrosoftVP_Ted
Member since 2013 • 82 Posts
I was going to pick up Win8, but I just want something more intuitive for desktop. I like the idea of getting rid of the start menu, but "Metro" is just a little awkward for desktop. Though, I might pick up a cheap MS Tablet...jcknapier711
WIN8 is the most intuitive OS, the complaints are it is too intuitive and has less options since it forces the metro interface with very little room to wiggle and no instant desktop. If you are looking for intuitive, look no further than windows 8, unless you have no idea what intuitive means and just say it like lots of other websites are doing now.
Avatar image for MicrosoftVP_Ted
MicrosoftVP_Ted

82

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 MicrosoftVP_Ted
Member since 2013 • 82 Posts

[QUOTE="MicrosoftVP_Ted"]Yet it's in 3rd place in the Smartphone market already? Also there are other companies making Windows Phones, you rlack of windows phone knowledge is possibly because of misnformation. Also Windows 8 works well for Tablets you do realize that right? And phones? Hello?Menalque2

It is in third place and will remain in third place at best. A giant corporation moving into the smartphone market and beating Blackberry OS at a time when keypads are on their deathbed is nothing extraordinary (especially when Blackberry OS is exclusive to proprietary devices and also a bit rubbish). There is simply no comparison to Android or iOS in terms of usability and content.

And where did I say it was exclusive to Nokia devices? I'm just saying Windows phones are tainted by their close association with a historically mediocre phone company (ask anybody who owned a Nokia before the smartphone revolution). I know you like cheerleading for Microsoft and that's great, but just accept the fact most human beings can't stand the Windows Metro UI and find it monstrous.

Blackberry wasn't in third-place when Windows 8 took over. Metro UI gains tons of compliments for tablets and smartphones and is only usually critizied for desk and lap tops, you have no clue what you are talking about. the Metro interface was applauded for Phones and tablets because it made sense, and even Apple said that it is more intuitive in the msartphone market. Customization is more so on Windowsphone8, you can' t deny it because I can list more customizations it can do then you can for the other two even if you stretch it and include things not relevant or related.
Avatar image for MicrosoftVP_Ted
MicrosoftVP_Ted

82

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 MicrosoftVP_Ted
Member since 2013 • 82 Posts
The Integraded HD 3000/4000 series by Intel are the most balanced and reliable graphics processors on the market and the most powerful:     I am impressed Intel is now relevant in 3D graphics.
Avatar image for MicrosoftVP_Ted
MicrosoftVP_Ted

82

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 MicrosoftVP_Ted
Member since 2013 • 82 Posts

[QUOTE="04dcarraher"]

[QUOTE="GeForce-"]

What interests me the most about the horsepower under next-gen consoles is how better the exclusives will be, gameplay-wise, visual-wise and the depth.

PC is still laughing at them though. This GPU...

[spoiler] [/spoiler]

:cool:

Tessellation

or

or

or

or

or

:twisted: :cool:

Ot a smaller more powerful HD3000
Avatar image for MicrosoftVP_Ted
MicrosoftVP_Ted

82

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 MicrosoftVP_Ted
Member since 2013 • 82 Posts

[QUOTE="Newhopes"]

[QUOTE="nightshade869"] I agree, but it does sort of prove the TC's point lol...PS4 is the talk of the town.clr84651

 

Sony fans are all talk, they hype everything then fail to buy it.

Then how did PS3 catch the 360 in sales?

It's in last place, catch what?