The fact that the government can and will read anything you say, any pictures you post, any thing at all that has to do with your private life, the words "mind your own f****** bussiness" is motive enough for any individual to be against it even if you have nothing to hide.I know what youre sayin man. And I know its lame and shouldnt be passed. I guess where Im at is that I just already figured that the gov. is corupt and spies on us anyway/ ive got nothing to hide so at this point whats the dif. Im not saying im ok with it, im not saying its ok, im just saying it doesnt seem like anything new nor do i really think that the average joe REALLY has anything to worry about. However I will admit that I know little about this stuff as well. Is there anything we can do to make sure it doesnt pass? Because also, in reseaching this and other bills you mentioned I see a lot of "the sky is falling" and "ZOMG THE GOVERNMENT IS GOING TO LOCK US ALL UP!" but no action.
Kraven1845
Mind_Mover's forum posts
No used games will severly backfire on the game industry, i've purchased many games brand new and regret a few of those purchases, and sold them for second hand and bought new games with the money.
If they want this to work they should slash the price of games by atleast 30-40%
However that wouldn't work either because the greedy mofos would sell the game half finished, and later sell you the rest of it for the same price.
Then there would be the scenario of piracy being alot worse, because their bussiness models are too restrictive and out of touch with what consumers want.
Depends on what you want.
Looks, for a one night stand, personality, for a long term relationship.
Also, the first thing that catches the eye are looks, i didn't say good looks cause everyone has their own preferences.
Realistically its looks first then personality.
I hope the idiots who think that this is stealing, and people should buy their own games and not share, realize a couple of things and stfu, the next time you're in the kitchen and want to toast some bread, think of the company that made the toaster, and think of the money they could loose because you were to lazy to go out and buy a toaster for your own use, instead of your moms.
The next time you need to borrow a pen in class? think about bic, tell the teacher to suspend the class so that you can go quickly to the store to buy a bloody pen. Your arguments are ridiculous.
It will be interesting to see what punishment the guy gets if found guilty. Might be "easier" to convict one person than for example in the case of the Haditha massacre where a troop of US marines killed 24 unarmed civilians (including old men and children) at close range. And where six of the seven had their cases dropped, and the seventh got a pay cut and a rank reduction.
Should also be noted that in the Mahmudiyah killings five US soldiers killed "only" four people, including raping a 14 year old girl and four of them got long sentences.
We intentionally invaded a whole damn country (Iraq) that had nothing to do with 9/11, what point was the government trying to make? That sadam had WMD's and was ready to use them? :lol:[QUOTE="Mind_Mover"]
[QUOTE="ad1x2"]
If the terrorists wanted to prove a point they should have just crashed all four planes into the Pentagon and other military targets. There was no reason to hit the WTC, which was full of civilians. They intentionally killed civilians, we didn't. Whether or not you want to believe that is your choice.
ad1x2
I don't know why people always bring up that Iraq had nothing to do with 9/11 when saying we shouldn't have invaded. Last time I checked the US had justification to invade based on over a dozen UN-mandated restrictions put on Iraq as a condition of Saddam's surrender in 1991 after the Gulf War he constantly broke. Bad intel told us he had a lot of WMDs, which proved false for the most part (there were a few illegal items found there, such as some yellowcake).
We invaded Iraq because of sadamn supposedly had WMD's, do you want me to fish up the numerous claims by bush and vice president, etc that said "Sadamn has WMD's we must invade"?Yellow cake is not a weapon of mass destrucion by itself, yellow cake is a lie.
Maybe not, maybe the terrorists don't get out of their way to kill civilians either maybe they just don't have millions of dollars in planes to drop bombs on their targets so they have to strap explosives on themselves and fly planes full of people to make their point. Either way both acts are equally disgusting using million dollar planes or not.[QUOTE="kuraimen"][QUOTE="mems_1224"] the problem is that people make it seem like the US goes out of its way to kill civilians
ad1x2
If the terrorists wanted to prove a point they should have just crashed all four planes into the Pentagon and other military targets. There was no reason to hit the WTC, which was full of civilians. They intentionally killed civilians, we didn't. Whether or not you want to believe that is your choice.
We intentionally invaded a whole damn country (Iraq) that had nothing to do with 9/11, what point was the government trying to make? That sadam had WMD's and was ready to use them? :lol:
Log in to comment