If you're counting it for the 360, then you have to count it for the PS3. metalmonkey268

it depends, if you have played it already then no it dosent count as an AAA game, and a LOT of ppl already did on their pc's and xbox's but for those radical ps3 fans that think its a sin to play games on any other kind of machine that doesn't have a blue ray and hd support, yes it is a AAA title. jokes apart , if you played it before no, if you didn't then you should check it out.

but personaly id say no it dosent count, since you have the same game on other systems they nullify each-other since its the exact same game on another platafor, dont get me wrong i just happen to belive that what makes a console worth buyng its what exclusives they offer, it dosent matter to me that the ps3 has a killer graphic if i can play the same game on a PC or a xbox for much less. sony really need to get back on their feet before its to late. but i think they are starting to get things on the right track with Home. all they need to do now is keep FF franshise as an exclusive or else, il have to start thinking about getting a xbox instead of a ps3

Works perfectly on Vista for me...... I believe one problem *could* be that Vista owners are relying on the Windows Update for newer drivers and such.... With ATI for example, Windows Update only installs the 7.1 drivers.... This could be the same case with NVidia too, but I don't think they release every month. It would be worth checking out at least. SuperBeast

Maybe they ran it on Vista.-Karayan-

With static lightning the game runs like a charm.... For me, full dynamic light is playable.

 ~2,4 ghz pentium 4

~ 6800 gt

~ 1 gig ram

FrozeN__54

[QUOTE="Mizarus"][QUOTE="gamerchris810"][QUOTE="Mizarus"]if you didnt liked oblivion stay away from STALKER, at least imo they both feel very similar, and i disliked both very muchA-S_FM

while there are individual elements that are similar, the sum of those elements is very different and offers a very different experience

at a superficial level, it's fair to compare them - describing stalker as oblivion with guns isn't unreasonable - but to assume that a person who disliked oblivion would therefore also dislike stalker, or vice versa, is absurd

oblivion is meant to be a roleplaying game - the (rubbish) quests and (hammy) character development are the meat on the game's bones - while in stalker, these elements are entirely superficial pheriphery - the game is a first person shooter - and people are gonna play it to fight guys with their guns, that's what the game is... and that's a lot of fun, while oblivion's combat was awfully implemented and didn't play into the other major elements of the gameplay very well at all

stalker has a great combat model, and the emphasis of the game is on combat - oblivion is a roleplaying game - those awkward quests and dire character development and rubbish click click click of the combat, that's what the game was

 similar gameplay elements on paper, but fundamentally different gameplay experiences