having played all three id have to say sword and shield is definately the weakest until you get some decent gear (unless u got dlc). Two handed is good but has slow swings, i found the dmg to be overkill most of the time because my team already dmged the enemy. 2 hand is probably the best for boss and miniboss encounters for indominable. I played dual warrior through nightmare and it was pretty much a breeze. dual weapon sweep has very low stamina cost and completely destroys multiple opponents. Lack of indominable and shield tower a bit annoying for bosses (push back ones only) though.
MondeEdlu's forum posts
i think we all know that regardless of situation that choice would really not be good when you know there are sequels expansions on the way.
and the dark promise choice kinda really spices up a sequel anyway
the game is actually very easy once you get the right set-ups. I found the beginning to be more challenging than most of the rest of the game simply because at that stage (unless your playing mage, which made it extremely easy), you'll only have warriors and its a bit more tough
i personally wouldn't get it. At its peak you could party and do missions and get the full experience, but now, without a good guild or some luck all your going to find are farmers and power traders.
the game will fail.
it has laughable drm, no new features, is 6 months old and COMES OUT IN MARCH.
I highly doubt many gamers have the time for a 6 months old no hype game when so many major titles are coming out.
and in the end ubi will blame piracy once more
no it won't have heroes.
slight possibility of heroes in campaign (like original starcraft)but they will definately not be part of skirmish and online modes. That said, blizz maycode heroes and make them availableforcustom maps as dota style maps are so popular
i guess your posting on gamespot from your ps3 then
i really think if some other company made a half decent os so people wouldnt automatically buy windows microsoft wouldnt be content completely raping the pc platform and knowing windows still sells. Glad vista failed wish it failed more
so i guess you guys are posting on this forum from your ps3s?
for all intents and purposes all of you need a computer anyway so the cost of pc gaming is only any additional performance over the pc that you would have anyway
Gamespot
Bioshock 2 pc review:
[See console review]
- no gamepad support
- widescreen doesnt work (patch coming)
- you get graphical options slightly better graphics than consoles
[see console score]
Wow that took me 45 seconds, and u can bet the actual review will be exactly as i predicted
Only slightly? You sure about that? My version disagrees. So does all the other pc users' but when does GAMESPOT ever write "pc graphics SIGNIFICANTLY BETTER" in their review, never. which was my point (i was writing what will be in their review)
Log in to comment