to get a six pack.

I've been stuck at a 4 pack forever, and it's so frustrating.

Starting something new with "Stallon situps" which are high intensity leg lifts. I'll let y'all know if it gets results.

Anybody else have this problem?

MakeMeaSammitch

The 6 inches exercise and deadlifts. Both work that lower band of muscles if that's the one you're talking about. If you have a pullup bar then hanging leg raises for sure.

I thought I could date a black chick I worked with until I saw her face when I pulled up in my barely-legal ford. Her head was leaning a full foot back from her shoulders. Definitely glad I saw that honest moment of disgust for what she turned out to be.

Meanwhile I've been practically hunting asian girls...they're like snow leopards. Still using box-traps but working on something better.

A girl would care.

I remember reading some great articles years ago claiming that people tend to measure the authenticity of war by making comparisons to Saving Private Ryan. In pretending to be authentic (hyper-real), films like SPR have completely skewed the general public's perceptions and expectations of war. So...yes, probably a terrible example there. If porn is like Saving Private Ryan, that doesn't support your argument. Planeforger

Seeing as porn skews mens views of sex that's EXACTLY what I'm saying in my argument. Porn is good for sex education but it carries unfortunate misconceptions just like a Sandra Bullock movie on love. The anti-porn stuff doesn't discriminate between female-oriented, sensual touching or lesbian or even soft-core and even says too many romance novels is bad. It skips a few parts that porn can't replicate of the human interaction but teaches sex nontheless. Porn doesn't even begin to replace another human being but they can coexist amicably. The fact that porn in Europe is seen differently as it is here is an example of social and cultural reinforcement shaping reactions and guilt/shame.

Read the link and dispute the assertion that the same pathways said to "mimic heroin addiction" are the same pathways that mimic sunsets and a host of other non-alarmist stimuli. It's akin to anorexia or binge-eating in that it's a behavioral excess. You can watch too much porn but it isn't the porn, it's you. You don't like what it feels like to eat, binge, or not rub one out so you return to repeating the behavior. This is about taking responsibility for your actions.

My mistake was assuming anyone on this forum would actually read the link instead of finding fap .gifs. The point is that there's a middle ground between commercialized porn and what actually happens between the sheets but saying it's all bad and neuro-degenerative isn't helping to get there.

I missed this in my travels of the indefinite electron overlay and was so very glad to have found something to temper the propaganda against porn. If your brain really couldn't tell the difference between 2d (even 3d) motion depictions and reality, we'd all have been to war after Saving Private Ryan. No one ever mentioned gay men being porn addicts or sex addicts because they're not being complained about by marriage defenders.

It's long but it has over-arching ramifications to how we medicalize human behavior and try to normalize what's specific to our culture and mostly judeo-christian foundation.

http://thehumanist.org/july-august-2012/you%E2%80%99re-addicted-to-what/

Edit: Leave Tiger alone!

I'm against smoking the plant for medicinal reasons as it causes more health problems. Extract the THC from the plant into a pill, or use a vaporizer -- but there's no reason to smoke the plant since it would cause lung impairment in the long run. Fightingfan

Marijuana isn't just THC. There's 60-some lesser cannabinoids that all do different things. The "playing god" you talk about with modern strains has seen a rise in CBD, the anti-psychotic compound that moderates THC. The pills don't work because it leaves so much out that they can't synthesize in context.

It doesn't deplete dopamine because of the endocannabinoid system that's all over your body. The reason it's safe is because these receptors switch off temporarily when you over-indulge. Cocaine is a direct dopaminergic rush that uses receptors your body can't turn off or recover. COMPLETELY DIFFERENT.

Tobacco can be bought by anyone over 18 for little to no health benefit and huge personal and public health concern. Why does cannabis need a health benefit before I can go buy it without seeing a doctor? To defend marijuana laws is to defend stupidity, regardless of your personal opinion of the substance.

http://www.webmd.com/lung-cancer/news/20060523/pot-smoking-not-linked-to-lung-cancer for your myth of lung impairment.

I've only watched it a little bit, but I can tell it's a decent show. I've really liked some episodes like the one where Barney is on the Price is Right. But it's not something I think I'll really get into, especially this late into the series. I didn't like it at first, but I gave it a chance. One show I really can't stand is The Big Bang Theory. Bleh, screw that show.SoNin360

Yeah I echo that completely. The Big Bang Theory just tries too hard to be nerd-humor like a lot of other stuff. It recycles cliches from the 80's that weren't funny then and especially aren't now. Some people just don't see through things like others I guess due to lack of exposure or personal differences.

And How I Met Your Mother would hold up better if it was only 3-4 seasons at most. There's just not enough substance to it after that and the writers don't get to actually conclude and make you reflect. The heartfelt moments run out after awhile and you can tell the writers get tired of setting up jokes all the time but still need a job.

This sounds like a mix of marketing and what they write on handouts at cult gatherings. I feel smarter than the guy that made Flash.

I wouldn't try to play CS 1.6 because of the skill level of everyone is bewildering to a new player. Even playing source as a brand new player will be infuriating. They could have 10/100 hp and you probably still wouldn't kill a good player due to reflexes and crosshair readiness. With CS: GO so soon it might not be worth it to learn. Definitely source over 1.6 though for new players.

[QUOTE="_Judas_"][QUOTE="AmnesiaHaze"]

when i was kid i remember throwing my N64 joysticks all the time , not so much from anger but frustration (for example when trying to beat some of the harder goldeneye time challenges and missed just a few seconds) , as i became older i dont have such emotional reactions while playing videogames anymore

lotusclown

That's the point. You're adapting to other people as opposed to preset behavior. You might know the map but the players always change.

If you have rage issues do NOT take it out on a pillow. You could develop that as a response to anger and not have a pillow when the time comes.