[QUOTE="MorisUkunRasik"][QUOTE="LosDaddie"]

[QUOTE="MorisUkunRasik"]if you want a 360 that is comparable to the ps3 you will end up spending more than a ps3 costs but people forget you do not have to do that, it comes with an ethernet chord you dont have to go online you don thave to buy the hddvd addon you dont need the elites hdmi out but if you are interested in those things the ps3 is truly worth its price tagSpruceCaboose

And sales are proving that most people aren't interested in the thingsyou mentioned.

its not a lack of public interest its a lack of money in the publics bank account or the unwillingness to drop 600 dollars on it. If it were cheaper sales would most definetly pick up.

And you could say that about all three of the systems.

surely if anything was cheaper more people would who were interested but its holds more water when attributed to something that costs as much as a PS3 especially when its competitors have much lower price tags.

[QUOTE="MorisUkunRasik"]

I thought MGS2 looked better than halo and they both were relased around the same time

SpruceCaboose

No one could argue that the Xbox had the most poweful system last generation. However, so far, it has not been shown that the 360 nor the PS3 have a game out that cannot be done on the other system. The only differences have been small issues that could easily be atributed to development issues and not the system's powers.

the xbox was most certainly the most powerful last gen and so far is not the end of the story we have quite a while before MS and sony end production on their current gen consoles.

[QUOTE="MorisUkunRasik"]if you want a 360 that is comparable to the ps3 you will end up spending more than a ps3 costs but people forget you do not have to do that, it comes with an ethernet chord you dont have to go online you don thave to buy the hddvd addon you dont need the elites hdmi out but if you are interested in those things the ps3 is truly worth its price tagLosDaddie

And sales are proving that most people aren't interested in the thingsyou mentioned.

its not a lack of public interest its a lack of money in the publics bank account or the unwillingness to drop 600 dollars on it. If it were cheaper sales would most definetly pick up.

[QUOTE="SpruceCaboose"][QUOTE="majadamus"][QUOTE="SpruceCaboose"]

[QUOTE="hooperalltheway"]the ps3 is 600 because its better hands downLosDaddie

Better in what way? It has some good games, but so do the Wii and 360. It has done some good things this gen, but so have the others. It would be near impossible to say any of the three were "better" at this stage.

Judging by hardware specs alone, PS3 is the better system. You get more bang for your buck as well, and less of it breaking down.

The system specs are much closer than most fanboys for either system would be willing to admit. And while one or the other might eak out a bit more horsepower in the future, as of now, no system can claim superiority where it matters, in actual, real games.

QFT!!

The "better" specs of the PS3 have yet to prove themselves. The Xbox flexed its muscle on Day 1 with Halo. The PS3 has yet to show any game that isn't possible on the x360.

I thought MGS2 looked better than halo and they both were relased around the same time

[QUOTE="funbunny"]If 'system specs' were a decent video game, then maybe the PS3 could compete with the Wii and 360.TheDarkDisciple

wow that is sig worthy

wow just wow