[QUOTE="MyersB93"][QUOTE="orb_03_2006"] I guess you could call it a zombie game. It was gonna be third person. Not like Resident Evil. I wanted the feel to be like a fast paced Gears of War(without the steroids). It was gonna be a survival game where your environment played a big part in combat. I really was gonna go for video game design, but the math was too cray. Up to Calculus 4!!! Yeah...orb_03_2006
wow bro could've done it if you stuck with it. sounds like one of those games that is so simple, but very addictive!! Yep. I wanted to have a survival mode with power ups(like damage+ and the works). I know I could have made a good game. But really, there was just too much. I suck at math lol.I hear you there
[QUOTE="MyersB93"][QUOTE="orb_03_2006"]Personally, I just want a really good survival game. Back when I was gonna go for video game design, I had the perfect game in mind. Oh well. :P As far as the industry goes, as long as there's a new CoD every year, the fish are being fed. I want more new and innovated games. Look at Singularity(haven't played it). It was so-so, but it tried something new. We need more developers to do these things.orb_03_2006
what was your game idea? I guess you could call it a zombie game. It was gonna be third person. Not like Resident Evil. I wanted the feel to be like a fast paced Gears of War(without the steroids). It was gonna be a survival game where your environment played a big part in combat. I really was gonna go for video game design, but the math was too cray. Up to Calculus 4!!! Yeah...wow bro could've done it if you stuck with it. sounds like one of those games that is so simple, but very addictive!!
[QUOTE="orb_03_2006"]Personally, I just want a really good survival game. Back when I was gonna go for video game design, I had the perfect game in mind. Oh well. :P As far as the industry goes, as long as there's a new CoD every year, the fish are being fed. I want more new and innovated games. Look at Singularity(haven't played it). It was so-so, but it tried something new. We need more developers to do these things.what was your game idea?
[QUOTE="MyersB93"][QUOTE="Solid_Legen"] Yeah, when they made MW2 they really dropped the ball and lost their general direction of where the game was heading, so instead of being better than COD 4, it was worse. And what confuses me, is that oringinaly zombies wasn't post to be in Black Ops. It was a "last minute" decision. They added it because they new it wasn't going to do well unless they added something that was interesting.Solid_Legen
exactly, so as soon as your having doubts about th popularity of your game that's coming out in 2 weeks ( in example), then you just need to stop. It just amazes me on how makers of games can be so worried over their game(I can see why). I mean look at Bethesda, they make great games. And they made Rogue Warrior which was like their "test game". I mean if your going to get worried about the game you should of posted a beta for it.Your my new best friend..LMAO
[QUOTE="MyersB93"][QUOTE="Solid_Legen"] I agree with what your saying with the it's just what your into. But what i don't agree with COD being one of the best running series for a long time. I think that should of just stopped COD after COD 4, and then tried to make a new series, and you know that people would buy the game if they made a new series, just because it's Actisvision or Treyarch. But if they stopped it at COD 4 I would still have some respect for them, i guess.Solid_Legen
Yeah, I would love to see another break out Military based series come out next year from either company! It's just Activision had a lot of sales for Call of Duty 4 and I see why they thought "why stop anything that's going this well". For that I respect them on some levels, but if you going to continue a series, you have to make it that much better then the previous. Yeah, when they made MW2 they really dropped the ball and lost their general direction of where the game was heading, so instead of being better than COD 4, it was worse. And what confuses me, is that oringinaly zombies wasn't post to be in Black Ops. It was a "last minute" decision. They added it because they new it wasn't going to do well unless they added something that was interesting.exactly, so as soon as your having doubts about th popularity of your game that's coming out in 2 weeks ( in example), then you just need to stop.
[QUOTE="MyersB93"]C.O.D is one the best running series for a long time, but everything must come to an end sometime. No one can put down Call of Duty just because the makers are screw ups, they made it the way they do all games in the own way. Sure M.O.H is more realistic in my opinion, but C.O.D is more of an arcade kind of feeling to it. It's just what your into I guess.Solid_Legen
I agree with what your saying with the it's just what your into. But what i don't agree with COD being one of the best running series for a long time. I think that should of just stopped COD after COD 4, and then tried to make a new series, and you know that people would buy the game if they made a new series, just because it's Actisvision or Treyarch. But if they stopped it at COD 4 I would still have some respect for them, i guess.Yeah, I would love to see another break out Military based series come out next year from either company! It's just Activision had a lot of sales for Call of Duty 4 and I see why they thought "why stop anything that's going this well". For that I respect them on some levels, but if you going to continue a series, you have to make it that much better then the previous.
C.O.D is one the best running series for a long time, but everything must come to an end sometime. No one can put down Call of Duty just because the makers are screw ups, they made it the way they do all games in the own way. Sure M.O.H is more realistic in my opinion, but C.O.D is more of an arcade kind of feeling to it. It's just what your into I guess.
Log in to comment