And no I'm not referring to scores.
I'm talking about how they feel the need to justify's Halo 3's visuals -- again.
If any of you remember, they did a Halo 2/Halo 3 picture comparison to prove that Halo 3 was not Halo 2 HD.
Cool.
Well they just did it again.
What's going on Gamespot? Running out of material? Why don't I see some FIFA 08 demo impressions on the front page or something that, you know, I haven't seen before.
Every review I've read on Halo 3 says the only downside was the visuals. They're good, but nothing spectacular.
Despite this, GS manages to create two articles worshipping Halo 3's graphics like it's the Crysis rival. They wrote a paragraph praising the character models, while Gametrailers (who gave Halo 3 a 9.8 ), said the character models were the most dissapointing thing in the game.
We all know Halo 3 looks better GS, what the hell are you trying to prove and why don't you have anything better to do?
Koalakommander
like you said visuals are nothing spectacular so if it were really good then it would've gotten a 10 but instead it gotten a 9.8 doesn't that do justice?
Log in to comment