The beta starts May 16th.BIGDEE06

thats why the topic is " to the ppl who has the halo 3 beta"

yea i just got done looking at the videos and there are minor upgrades to it IMO. just hoping its not exactly like halo 2. but yea im looking foward to ut3 more than halo 3footballa27

UT3 looks with even more minor upgrades, wat new features are on UT3? better graphics and better weapon models, and some tweaking to a old gametype?

Halo 3 lets you save film and you'll be able to send it to anybody across the world in an instant. It also has complete stat tracking that says what weapons you got the most kills with how many games you played, what your kdr is (kill death ratio if u play cs), if your a glitcher/griefer/deranker. It also has 7 new weapons, 4 new equipment, 1 new vehicle, 2 more gametypes, and 3 brand new maps. btw this is all in the beta there could be way more in the retail version.

so I dont see anything special in UT3 it'll prolly be another hitscan fest like ut2004 

what is the weapon respawn like?

is it like halo 2 where you have to deplete it's ammo before it respawns?

or is it like Halo 1 where after it spawns its timer resets ? 

[QUOTE="citizen-zero"]GOW online is great. Some people just cant handle dying...... **** immature noobs that cant play a game online....why do people blame loosing on host advantage. The host advantage is like what, 1 to 100 milliseconds......wow....unless you have super human reflexes, its not much of an advantage..so, noobs, learn how to play the game. and, you cant cheat at an Xbox 360 game, get over itmmielnik

Correction GoW was great. The multiplayer was fantastic but this game quickly became one of the most glitchy and lagging game i have ever played. After playin gthis game game non-stop for about 3 weeks it quickly became more and more less fun. The host advantage is terrible especially when you shoot at a guy and the bullets go right through him. The game is supposed to be a realistic game that uses cover. However in multiplayer all everyone does is roll up to you and shot gun you at close range. The game was great until people started using the glitches to win the games.

I remember quite clearly while I was playing a game we were about to win the match up 6 games to 2 in a 7 round match. It was 1 on 1 with me trying to find the last guy. Although I witnessed him glitching into the map and hiding from me. He forced a draw and kept doing this which kept us from killing him. Eventually they found out that they could kill is through certain walls. They almost won the match when they tied it 6 to 6. Luckily I found out how to glitch into the map and killed all 4 of them from behind. Thgis and much more caused the multiplayer to ecline rapidly. I played recently and was disgusted with myself on how i thought this was fun. Although I used the same tactics that won me game after game when it first came out. It just shows how bad some gamers are now a days.

you losers should learn to play player match and quit worrying about some number next to the thing that says "kills" because nobody cheats in player match. plus you can play with your friends in player match. 

Zelda games have more lasting appeal. I still play my collectors edition of the original three. Zelda appeals to all the parents as a game to purchase for there kids. Halo gets slapped by time and graphics as something comes out looks nicer and is more fun to play, Halo dies. Halo is only like by a small segment.caseypayne69

if you go on XBC (xbox connect) you will find people that still play Halo 1. Halo 2 is clearly better looking but people who  actually played Halo 1 multiplayer without using AR's will find that Halo 1 > Halo 2. YOU may still play the collectors edition of the original three but do other people? and with the "Halo gets slapped by time and graphics as something comes out looks nicer and is more fun to play, Halo dies." comment Halo is still the most played FPS on XBL. I dont see perfect dark or call of duty 3 passing it which has clearly better graphics.

[QUOTE="NoNam3r"][QUOTE="fuzzysquash"]

[QUOTE="NoNam3r"]get 1.6, source is noobed upfuzzysquash

stick to 1.6, n00b.50shot

I love it when people talk like this. As if they were pro's or something that are too good for Source :roll:

Time to move on, people. It ain't 1999.

To TC: Yes, get Source. I've wasted hundreds of hours of my life on that game.

You dont think the better person should win?

I personal think I shouldn't have to wait a few minutes to respawn just because CS:S is just spray n pray

you wouldn't last very long in 1.6 or Source with a simply spray & pray tactic

in source most ppl just spray cuz the hitboxes on the head is bigger and there are less recoil on the guns so in source spray n pray happens all the time while it would never work in 1.6 

Mastcheif is not a horse, hes a human. Smaller FOV makes for more realisim anyways, afterall, he is wearing helmet.

Pro_wrestler

 Every other FPS has 90 degrees fov. 60 degrees is BS. There is no good reason for 60 degrees. PPl who played halo 2 PC have been gettin motion sickness for some reason and I think that's y. Halo 3 is going back to 90 degrees and that's how it should be imo.

No, a field of view of 90 was stupid. He's wearing a big ass helmet. It's 60-70. Deal with it. If you melee someone you don;t see ****. Period.death1505921