Microsoft made a wise decision launching first and avoiding the failure of going up against Sony & Nintendo. 360's early lead allowed the developers to get to grips with 360 architecture before the competition arrived thus making 360 games slighty supperior because PS3 and Wii were relatively new. Well actually developers didn't have trouble with the Wii because its essentially Gamcube achitecture with innovative controls. Sony creates awesome consoles for the long-term but they don't show their potential untill atleast a year after launch, I mean sure the games look great but throughout lifespan the games keep looking better & better, PS3 will be no exception.
It took 360 a year to churn out something like GeOW and still to this day, 7 months after release, no game has yet delivered something of GeOW level on the 360. This fall is when PS3 starts to gain control and show the world whats it made of. I never judge a console untill a year after it has released, I did this for the 360 (I was disappointed) and now I'm doing it for PS3.
I believe next year you will trully see a difference between PS3 and 360 games, maybe only slightly in graphics but definitely on physics, particle effects and lighting. Next year you will see the PS3 difference. oh wait I just read your mind, let me guess "just wait". You guys make it sound like Sony has never delivered when it comes to games, I guess turning 360 has made you blind against other consoles.
For now the difference between PS3 & 360 is minimal and the 360 had a year head start, from this fall onwards PS3 will look superior.
Swift_Boss_A
this is a smart post TC, however, logic just doesn't exist in SW. sad.
Log in to comment