[QUOTE="evilbarbarian"]Maybe GS is biased after all.. I can't see how X360 games, such as PDZ, Gears of War and Forza II all score better then MP3 and Zelda.. It just doesn't make sense.
Pdiddy105
MP3 and Zelda TP deserved the scores they got. Unlike every other site, GS doesnt just tack on a 9.5 or 10 because of the hype, they actually compare the games with their previous counterparts and try to note the differences. MP3's gameplay was starting to become stale just like how Zelda TP's outdated graphics and fetch quests caused the game to flop.
Which is why they commended MP3 for being a Great Sequel in the sense that it delivers an experience that is a massive improvement over the prior games and then simutanously docks it for being more of the same? Or maybe that's the reason why they praised the controls but then said that the controls were so streamlined that it made the game easy and damaged the Metroid gameplay feel of exploration, despite how at one point in the review, its stated that Prime 3 has exploration parts in the same vein and number as the other Prime games with its own twist to it?
The score should be secondary to the review content, not the other way around. If the content can't back up the score (Which any cow, lemming, or whatever can see, and some have admitted to), then we have a pretty big problem here.
EDIT: I mean, just as a non MP3 related example, look at Super Metroid. Is there any concrete reason to why a con like "First port in 13 years" should automatically bump the game out of AAA status, when in the review itself, they have barely any complaints?
Log in to comment