I have both. Right now I've been playing both about the same. I finally got back on my PS3 with the release of Ratchet(which is one great game btw). They're both great systems. 360 does have more games that I'm interested in at the moment, but that'll change when the PS3 gets some more great quality titles. With the PS3 you definitely get more bang for your buck, the only thing I see wrong is that with all of things they implemented into the system, hardly anyone I know actually utilizes those extras. Hardly any of my friend shave gotten into blu-ray, they see no point. I think they could've gone without some of the things they put in. The 360 is great, it just has basically the essentials to play the games and get started there. PSN and XBL, are comparable, but with some more features XBL still has a bit of an advantage over PSN. Graphics right now are a bit equal, although we're really starting to see what the PS3 can do.

What system you get just depends on your preference for games.

[QUOTE="PelekotansDream"]What I find difficult is how did a game with a 5 hour single player experience with a good multiplayer have problems fitting to a disc when Oblivion was able to fit on a disc.The_Crucible

Look at Oblivion. While the world is huge, its contents are repeatative. You see the same old character models. The same old background pallette. And the same old buildings, grass, and trees. I don't think that game really pushes any limits in hardware power nor capacity.

does it matter if the textures are overused? unless you're really looking for that kind of thing, you hardly notice while playing. The game is HUGE and more developers should take ideas on how to make a game world, because the developers over at Bethesda did one hell of a job.

Im gonna be pickin up one of those 8800 GT's soon, I can't wait, cheap and amazing.

P.S. Already got a PS3

[QUOTE="REforever101"]

yea, im kinda new to pc upgrades, and i was wondering something

if i got an 8800 gt, would i need to upgrade my cpu (my computer is old...really old)

REforever101

anyone know....

help please

Yes, if yo want that thing to keep up. Probably should upgrade your power supply, well depends on the watss, how many watts is it?

All previews have said differently. Don't listen to this kid. Finale-

All previews said differntly about lair.

I'm waiting for reviews and until i get a chance to play this game.

Minesweeper.thirstychainsaw

My computer only got about 2 FPS at that game. Gah, looks like I gotta spend $2000 to upgrade my computer... :P

[QUOTE="deadmeat59"]i dont need proof if the nvidia 8500gt can only get like 15fps like the guy said then ur going to need like a 9800ultra when it comes outMeu2k7

8500 isnt even a gaming card :S ... or barely.

Agreed, shoulda spent a little more for an 8600

[QUOTE="Vandalvideo"]Its obviously user error. I'm using a 7900GS and I can run it on high/med easily.Reyes360

SOrry the game isnt what you all thought it would be.

LMAO

"When I finally good a good "high-end" brand newrig (because everyone has to start somewhere) for $2000in January 2005, I find out I could only runthe best of games on medium-high performance for that year, if that. Here in 2007, Bioshock struggles to run on the lowest settings possible, the Unreal 3 demo looks worse than Quake 1 on my computer and for some strange reason, Half Life 2 and CS Source are running slower than usual"

I can't believ that part TC. I agree somewhat on other things you said, but the rig im on right now with computer parts almost 5 yrs old, and just added in a 7600, runs Bioshock medium settings, Unreal Tournament looks fine. If you spent $2000 on a gaming rig only 2 yrs ago, there's no way you could not run every game that year on high.

Lets see your specs