[QUOTE="Jaysonguy"][QUOTE="RyanWare"] The Wii is essentially a souped-up GC. In terms of raw power, the Wii is hands down more powerful than the Xbox. However, you're right that the Wii is not able to easily pump out advanced pixel shaders like the Xbox was. It is certainly capable of them - bump mapping, normal mapping, etc. - but it taxes the hardware more than it did on the Xbox. So Wii games can't use them as liberally as Xbox games did.
So, all things considered, Wii titles will graphically hover around the Xbox's best. And considering the Wii uses such a familiar architecture - identical to the GC's - we aren't going to see significant improvement in visuals as time goes on because developers are already perfectly familiar with the hardware (which would be evident if it weren't for all of the PS2 ports). Something like Mario Galaxy is likely pushing the Wii pretty hard, and I wouldn't expect a lot more from the Wii. Especially without technical wizards like Rare and Factor 5.
cxerphax
Really everything in here is wrong but the bold parts are like extra wrong.
The Wii isn't a souped up Gamecube no more then an XBOX360 is a souped up XBOX.
u just sir are the most retarded person ever. the xbox 360 is not a souped up xbox it has so much more power then the dam xbox where the hell do u get ur information ur post has made me totally angry
You're right, albeit a little too angry. If the Xbox 360 were just souped-up Xbox hardware it wouldn't need a bunch of patches to run Xbox games (just like how the Wii can runGC games without downloading any other software).
Edit: sorry about that.
Log in to comment