@LDSLurk @furqan2006 Lol it's the same engine... and COD will never compare to BF3 on a graphical level (and that's not biased). BF3 and RE5 have had some of the best graphics this gen. I can easily name 10 other games that can easily top COD. I'm not saying graphics make a game in any sense, but in all seriousness, COD graphics have been outdated for a long, long time.
I'm so glad they included Super Monkey Ball! And I'm surprised Bayonetta was included lol, it's a really good game that not many people have played. Also, it's missing Portal 2 :O!
I got tired of Assassin's Creed on the second one. It just seemed to get far away from it's original roots and went to some kind of religious mystical powers. Then, imo, they milked the series by adding a multiplayer game to appeal to more people (which is fine) but then they progressed with Desmond's story (which I think isn't fair). They should have just added a side story that didn't have to progress the main character's story; instead they tried to make both single player and multiplayer gamers have to buy the same game for more sales. Now they are coming out with yet another story arc for Ezio. To be honest, before they saw the success with 1 and 2, I can bet they only planned for a trilogy. If they wanted more sales, they should have just added a separate story line or introduced a new protagonist after AC3 came out.
@roll_tide_l - MW2? That game wasn't that great graphically imo. I think that RE5 is way up there on the list of best looking games. (Also the Vanquish demo was pretty sweet). I personally think that MW2 was simply "alright" or "so-so" on every level. The Bioshock Infinite video looked like some of the best graphics I've seen! Can't wait for that. And we can't forget about Dead Space :)
@Arsyad00 - Lol, it would look the same fanboy. The PS3's graphics and 360's graphics are very, very close. If they weren't, then you wouldn't need to argue, because there would be a clear winner. (Referring to 360 and PS3 fanboys alike, this doesn't relate to Arsyad00 :) ) = Arguing which is better is just going to make you look stupid and in a way clearly shows that you think that both are close graphically.
Grunt is better in Reach as well as the Ghost, but all the other vehicles looked way better in Halo 3. The environments seem to be the same, but more favor Reach. Overall, 3 looked better from these pics, but from what I've seen, Reach looks better in motion.
The needler looked way better in Halo 3. I don't see what the big deal is about any of the other pics, look the same to me. The assault rifle looked better in Reach though.
Oozyrat's comments