[QUOTE="Osafune24"][QUOTE="SaintLeonidas"][QUOTE="pseudodog07"][QUOTE="smarb001"][QUOTE="pseudodog07"][QUOTE="TallicaFan2005"] There is NO war on TEROR in Iraq.
Obama ftw.
mingo123
So, you don't call fighting suicide bombers and Al Queda in Iraq a war on terror?
The suicide bombers and al queda came because they want to kill US soldiers. The US attracts terrorists like flies onto a pile of...
I'll let you finish that sentence. :)
So, all the Iraqi people who have died from terrorist bombings you just ignore? Were the terrorists just confused and thought they were US soldiers?
Those terrorist attacking the innocent in Iraq, killing women and children and soldiers, guess what, they were not there untill after we were, so all those deaths you speak of, they are in turn our fault. If we had not gone into Iraq, then neither would al Queda. How many times do we have to say it, should I draw a time table so you can see it visually that it went Us goes into Iraq, THEN al Queda follows to attack soldiers and kill Iraqi civilians/police/military.
Right... So I guess Saddam didn't gas the Kurds until after we invaded and toppled him, huh?
1. didnt America supply the poisonus weapons to Saddadm to kill kurds? and 2. what does Saddam have to do with terrorists? 3. there would have been a reasonw hy Saddam gases kurds, just like America nuked Japan
1. Probably, and hey, wouldn't you know it, we supplied weapons, funds, and knowledge to the Taliban and Al Qaeda as well :O
2. Gassing cities for the sake of killing people isn't a kind of terrorism?
3. Nagasaki and Hiroshima contained important military bases for the Japanese military and one of them, I forget which, was the only target not containing a POW camp. If our soul intent was to kill as many people as possible, we would have attacked other cities, and we never would have stopped. So I hardly consider the atomic bombings and Saddam's genocidal gassing of the Kurds to be on the same level.
Log in to comment